Pennsylvania Co., for Ins., on Lives and Grantlng Annuities v. Cox
Decision Date | 19 April 1938 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Delaware |
Parties | THE PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY FOR INSURANCES ON LIVES AND GRANTLNG ANNUITIES, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and A. MERRITT TAYLOR, Trustees under the will of John Sellers, Jr., Deceased, and FRANK S. GARRETT, Holders of Common Stock of Edge Moor Iron Company, a dissolved corporation of the State of Delaware, Appellants, v. FRANK G. COX and JOHN H. SHIVELY, Receivers by appointment of the Chancellor of the State of Delaware of said Edge Moor Iron Company, Petitioners Below, and FRANK G. COX, JOHN H. SHIVELY and WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Trustees under the Will of William F. Sellers, Deceased, holders of preferred stock of said Edge Moor Iron Company, and EDGE MOOR IRON COMPANY, a dissolved corporation of the State of Delaware, and HELEN S. GARRETT, Appellees |
APPEAL from a decree of the Court of Chancery.
Edge Moor Iron Company, a Delaware Corporation was in process of dissolution. Frank G. Cox and John H. Shively, were, on December 18, 1935, appointed receivers by the Chancellor.
In 1919, the charter of the company was amended so as to provide for the issuance of preferred stock, the pertinent provisions of the amendment being as follows:
At the time of the amendment, Section 13 of the General Corporation Law ( ) was, in part, as follows:
At the time of the appointment of the receivers, the corporation had issued and outstanding preferred and common stock. Regular semi-annual dividends on the preferred stock were paid by the company on the preferred stock until April 1, 1932, when it passed the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Goldman v. Postal Telegraph, Civil Action No. 342.
...liquidation priorities." See, too, Garrett v. Edge Moor Iron Co., 22 Del. Ch. 142, 194 A. 15, affirmed sub nom. Pennsylvania, etc., Co. v. Cox, 23 Del. Ch. 193, 199 A. 671. 8 To say that in fact they have no such knowledge is to ask the courts to indulge in a judicial paternalism that would......
-
Cox v. Sellers
... ... in such event continue for the respective lives of my wife and daughter, but in Case my daughter ... Edge Moor Iron Co., 22 Del.Ch. 142, 194 A.15, 16. The provisions ... the Supreme Court under the caption Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives, etc, v. Cox, ... ...
-
In re Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
...I think Garrett v. Edge Moor Iron Co., 22 Del.Ch. 142, 194 A. 15, affirmed sub nom. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives and Granting Annuities v. Cox, 23 Del.Ch. 193, 199 A. 671 (followed and cited with approval in Waldner v. Equitable Loan Society, D.C.Del., 60 F.Supp. 372) would make......
-
Staar Surgical Co. v. Waggoner
...767 (D.Del.1943); Garrett v. Edge Moor Iron Co., Del.Ch., 194 A. 15, 18 (1937), aff'd sub nom., Pennsylvania Co. For Ins. On Lines & Granting Annuities v. Cox, Del.Supr., 199 A. 671, 673 (1938); Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Const. Corp., 151 A. 228, 234 (1930), rev'd in part, 155 A. 514 ......