Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.
| Docket Number | 20110565 |
| Decision Date | 09 April 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
57 cases
-
State v. Sosa-Hurtado
...each part or section be construed in connection with every other part or section so as to produce a harmonious whole." Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd. , 2013 UT 22, ¶ 15, 301 P.3d 984 (emphasis omitted) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted). "Thus, we interpret [ ] statu......
-
Bylsma v. Willey
...the most natural reading of these two provisions is that the LRA forecloses only contribution and not indemnity.116 Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd. , 2013 UT 22, ¶ 15, 301 P.3d 984 (We "seek to give effect to omissions in statutory language by presuming all omissions to be purposeful." ......
-
Rutherford v. Talisker Canyons Fin., Co.
...result. First, in Hawkins ex rel. Hawkins v. Peart , 2001 UT 94, 37 P.3d 1062, superseded by statute as stated in Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd. , 2013 UT 22, 301 P.3d 984,1 we unambiguously declared that it would violate public policy to allow a parent to "release a minor’s prospectiv......
-
USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorp
...15–1–1 did not apply to the case and applying another statutory prejudgment interest rate).198 Utah Code § 15–1–1(2).199 Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd., 2013 UT 22, ¶ 15, 301 P.3d 984 (citation omitted) (second alteration in original).200 Turner v. Staker & Parson Cos., 2012 UT 30, ¶ 1......
Request a trial to view additional results