People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann

Decision Date24 May 1965
CitationPeople ex rel. Accurso v. McMann, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 23 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. William ACCURSO, Appellant, v. Daniel McMANN, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

S. J. Marynowski, Schenectady, for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Anthony J. Lokot, Albany, for respondent.

Before GIBSON, P. J., and HERLIHY, TAYLOR, AULISI and HAMM, JJ.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • People v. Harper
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • August 25, 1987
    ...311 N.Y.S.2d 722. Some cases simply cite Harty or CPL Section 380.30, thus merely begging the question. E.g., People ex rel Accurso v. McMann, 23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916. Other cases use contradictory wording which impedes meaningful conceptual analysis. E.g., People v. Green, 40 Misc.......
  • People v. Bressette
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 1, 1973
    ...25 A.D.2d 451, 267 N.Y.S.2d 239, mot. for lv. to app. den. 17 N.Y.2d 423, 270 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 217 N.E.2d 41; People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann, 23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, mot. for lv. to app. den. 16 N.Y.2d 486, 274 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 211 N.E.2d 656; People v. Warrelman, 42 Misc.2d 783, 249......
  • People ex rel. Hunter v. Fay
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 28, 1966
    ...to impose sentence on this relator (People ex rel. Cassone v. Fay, 18 A.D.2d 1095, 239 N.Y.S.2d 801; People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann, 23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916). ...
  • People ex rel. Albanese v. McMann
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 20, 1966
    ...initially appointing the time for the pronouncement of judgment did not deprive the court of jurisdiction. (People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann, 23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 777, mot. for lv. to app. den. 16 N.Y.2d 486, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 211 N.E.2d 656; People ex rel. DeBerry v. McMann, 24 A.D......
  • Get Started for Free