People ex rel. Amato v. Fritz

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation45 N.Y.2d 823,409 N.Y.S.2d 212
Parties, 381 N.E.2d 610 The PEOPLE ex rel. Sam AMATO, etc., Appellant, v. Harry FRITZ, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Decision Date14 September 1978

Page 212

409 N.Y.S.2d 212
45 N.Y.2d 823, 381 N.E.2d 610
The PEOPLE ex rel. Sam AMATO, etc., Appellant,
v.
Harry FRITZ, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of New York.
Sept. 14, 1978.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that relator, having been released from imprisonment, is not entitled to the relief of habeas corpus (CPLR 7002(a); Peo. ex rel. Wilder v. Markley, 26 N.Y.2d 648, 307 N.Y.S.2d 672, 255 N.E.2d 784). --- A.D.2d ---, 407 N.Y.S.2d 770.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Peterson v. Demskie, Docket No. 96-2878
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • February 5, 1997
    ...875, 407 N.Y.S.2d 770 (2d Dep't 1978) (table), and leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals was denied, People v. Peterson, 45 N.Y.2d 823, 409 N.Y.S.2d 1054, 381 N.E.2d 625 (1978). Peterson filed his federal habeas corpus petition in the District Court on July 5, 1996. Judge Brieant......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT