People ex rel. Cook Cnty. v. Nelson

Decision Date24 June 1932
Docket NumberNo. 21415.,21415.
Citation181 N.E. 635,349 Ill. 193
PartiesPEOPLE ex rel. COOK COUNTY et al. v. NELSON, Auditor of Public Accounts, et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Petition by the People of the State of Illinois, on the relation of the County of Cook and another, for a writ of mandamus against Oscar Nelson, Auditor of Public Accounts, and another.

Writ denied.

Urban A. Lavery, of Chicago, for petitioners.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Atty. Gen., and Montgomery S. Winning, of Springfield, for respondents.

HEARD, C. J.

A distressing public emergency demanding the aid and relief of the state for its residents who were destitute and in necessitous circumstances arose and was apparent in the fall of 1931, and on November 2 the Governor issued a proclamation calling attention to the necessity of authorizing and providing for furnishing employment during the appproaching winter and of obtaining funds to provide emergency relief, and called a special session of the Legislature for November 5, 1931, for the purpose, among others, of ‘supplying funds * * * to provide emergency relief.’ A call for another special session, issued January 14, 1932, recited that ‘during the last two years this country has been experiencing an economic change-a process of deflation following a period of inflation.’ A third call followed on January 28, which recognized the magnitude of the problem of caring for the increasing number of unemployed in the state. In addressing the third special session of the Fifty-Seventh General Assembly upon its convening the Governor very forcefully stated: ‘A civilized people cares for its members in distress. In a few days the resources of voluntary subscription and the ordinary local governmental aid in Cook county and Chicago will fail entirely. * * * The problem must be met. We must care for the many of our citizens who through no fault of their own need food and shelter and clothing. As Governor of the State of Illinois it is my duty to call to your attention this deplorable situation. The constitution vests in you, the legislative body of the State, the power to enact appropriate legislation to meet this condition.’ The Legislature, fully realizing its responsibility, enacted emergency measures which resulted in the Illinois Emergency Relief Commission, with an appropriation of $20,000,000 for the relief of the unemployed and destitute of the state.

During the pendency of the proposed relief legislation in the Legislature and prior to the enactment of the law creating the commission and making the appropriation for moneys to be used by it, the county board of Cook county requested and induced a large number of firms and concerns, including the relator, the Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company, to furnish and provide food, fuel, and wearing apparel from December, 1931, to February 6, 1932, for the public relief of residents of Cook county who were in destitute and necessitous circumstances; the claims and liabilities therefor amounting to about $1,500,000. After its organization the Illinois Emergency Relief Commission took over and assumed the burden of giving relief in Cook county, as well as throughout the state, to persons who in its opinion were destitute and in necessitous circumstances and deserving of such relief. The Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company presented to the commission its claim in the sum of $102,452.89 to be approved for payment by the commission for coal delivered by it to persons in necessitous circumstances, as directed by the Cook County Bureau of Public Welfare, from January 4 to January 31, 1932, inclusive. A voucher for this amount was issued by the commission and forwarded to the respondents, Garrett D. Kinney, director of finance, and Oscar Nelson, auditor of public accounts of the state of Illinois, with the request that Kinney approve the voucher and Nelson issue a warrant to the Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company for the amount of the voucher drawn against the treasurer of the state of Illinois. Kinney refused to approve the voucher and Nelson refused to issue a warrant therefor for the reason that the purchase...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People ex rel. Eitel v. Lindheimer
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 7 Junio 1939
    ...9 N.E.2d 212;Vulcan Detinning Co. v. Industrial Comm., 295 Ill. 141, 128 N.E. 917;In re Tuller, 79 Ill. 99, 22 Am.Rep. 164;People v. Nelson, 349 Ill. 193, 181 N.E. 635); and cases where the new statute was a revision or amendment changing or continuing a penalty or a remedy (Kelly v. People......
  • People ex rel. Heydenreich v. Lyons
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 10 Diciembre 1940
    ...has failed to perform. One who petitions for the writ must show that he has a clear right to the relief which is demanded. People v. Nelson, 349 Ill. 193, 181 N.E. 635. This, the relators' petition for the writ of mandamus failed to do. The motion in the nature of a demurrer to dismiss the ......
  • Wilson v. N.M. Lumber & Timber Co.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 27 Junio 1938
    ...Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co., 6 Cir., 73 F.2d 446; Mutual Relief Ass'n v. Parker, 171 Ark. 952, 287 S.W. 199; People ex rel. Cook County v. Nelson, 349 Ill. 193, 181 N.E. 635; Bretthauer v. Jacobson, 79 N.J.L. 223, 75 A. 560. In the case last mentioned above the court said (page 561): “If ......
  • Wehrmeister v. Carlman
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 14 Abril 1958
    ... ... the Recorder of Deeds or of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, prior to the original passage of this ...         In People ex rel. Petty v. Thomas, 1935, 361 Ill. 448, at page 456, ... 142, 157 N.E. 185; People ex rel. Jacobi v. Nelson, 1931, 346 Ill. 247, 178 N.E. 485; People ex rel. County of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT