People ex rel. Owen v. Miami Nation Enterprises
| Docket Number | S216878 |
| Decision Date | 22 December 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Ito v. Copper River Native Ass'n
...Advance & Preferred Cash Loans v. State ex rel. Suthers, 242 P.3d 1099, 1110 (Colo. 2010); People ex rel. Owen v. Miami Nation Enters., 2 Cal.5th 222, 211 Cal.Rptr.3d 837, 386 P.3d 357, 366-67 (2016); Hwal'Bay Ba: J Enters., Inc. v. Jantzen, 248 Ariz. 98, 458 P.3d 102, 107-10 (2020); Great ......
-
Ransom v. GreatPlains Fin.
... ... profit on its operations to benefit the people of the Gros ... Ventre and Assiniboine ... ex rel. Owen v. Miami Nation Enters., 386 P.3d 357, 374 ... ...
-
California v. Azuma Corp.
... ... immunity[.]” People v. Miami Nation Enters. , 2 ... Cal. 5th ... ...
1 firm's commentaries
-
District Court Allows Mohawk Tribe to Join ANDA Litigation, Finds Patents at Issue Invalid
...prices will be the ultimate measure of whether this arrangement was clever or foolhardy. Kevin E. Noonan People ex rel. Owen v. Miami Nation Enterprises, 386 P.3d 357 (Cal. 2016)). With regard to whether the Tribe has retained sufficient rights to be a necessary party, the Court considered ......