People ex rel. Simon v. Bradley
Decision Date | 25 March 1913 |
Citation | 207 N.Y. 592,101 N.E. 766 |
Parties | PEOPLE ex rel. SIMON et al. v. BRADLEY et al. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Mandamus by the People, on the relation of William Simon and others, constituting the Terminal Station Commission of the City of Buffalo, against John H. Bradley and others, constituting the Board of Aldermen and others. From an order of the Appellate Division (139 N. Y. Supp. 1139) affirming an order directing a peremptory writ to issue, respondents appeal. Affirmed.
Chapter 842 of the Laws of 1911, including its title, is as follows:
‘An act creating a railway terminal station commission of the city of Buffalo, defining its powers and authorizing said city to issue its bonds.
‘The People of the state of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
‘Section 1. The mayor of the city, ex officio, the commissioner of public works, exofficio, the chairman of the grade crossing commission of said city, William Simon, Spencer Clinton, James Smith, John N. Scatcherd, William Henry Hotchkiss, Henry Schaefer, Robert R. Hefford, H. Montgomery Gerrans and William H. Crosby are appointed commissioners, any seven of whom are authorized and directed to adopt, from time to time, plans for the purpose of relieving the congested condition of the railroad stations and terminals in the city of Buffalo, which plans shall require the railroads, or other transportation corporations operating within the city of Buffalo, to make such changes in the location or use of any existing tracks, switches, terminals, stations or railroad facilities within said city, and which shall require the city to make such changes in the location or grades of the streets, alleys or lands owned by said city, adjacent to or contiguous to such tracks, switches, terminals, stations or facilities, which in the judgment of said commissioners will secure to the public freedom from the obstruction of the streets of said city by railroads and adequate services and facilities for the transportation of passengers, freight and property in said city.
‘Sec. 2. The said commissioners shall be known as the ‘Terminal Station Commission of the City of Buffalo.’ They shall take the oath of office required by the Constitution. They shall elect one of their number chairman, and may employ such assistants, including a secretary, an attorney, an engineer or engineers, and provide for their use such offices as they may deem necessary, the salaries of whom and expenses of which shall be fixed by said commission and be paid by the city. Seven of said commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. No contract, lease or grant on behalf of said city shall be let or made unless signed by at least seven of said commissioners, and no act of said commissioners shall be valid unless approved by at least seven of said commissioners.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Achenbach v. Kincaid
... ... 230, 231; Fletcher v. Prather, 102 Cal. 413, 36 P ... 658; People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481; Copland v ... Pirie, 26 Wash. 481, 90 Am. St ... 92 P. 995, 14 L. R. A., N. S., 1259; Pioneer Irr. Dist ... v. Bradley, 8 Idaho 310, 101 Am. St. 201, 68 P. 295; ... State v. Jones, 9 Idaho ... Board of Supervisors, 128 Mich. 552, 87 ... N.W. 789; State ex rel. Olson v. Board of ... Commissioners, 83 Minn. 65, 85 N.W. 830; Gage v ... 312, Ann ... Cas. 1912C, 994, 113 P. 775; People ex rel. Simon v. Bradley, ... 207 N.Y. 592, 101 N.E. 766.) ... "In ... ...
-
In re Kessler
... ... v. Curry, ... 155 Cal. 638, 103 P. 341; People v. Grant, 157 Mich ... 24, 133 Am. St. 329, 121 N.W. 300; Dudley v ... Wash. 312, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 994, 113 P. 775; People ex ... rel. Simon v. Bradley, 207 N.Y. 592, 101 N.E. 766.) ... "In ... ...
-
Long Sault Dev. Co. v. Kennedy
...it possesses completely the legislative power of the people retained under the federal and state Constitutions. People ex rel. Simon v. Bradley, 207 N. Y. 592, 101 N. E. 766;Gautier v. Ditmar, 204 N. Y. 20, 97 N. E. 464, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 960. In People v. Baltimore & O. R. R. Co ., 117 N. Y......
-
State v. Public Service Commission
...(N. S.) 713; State ex rel. v. Mason, 153 Mo. 23, 54 S. W. 524; Kenefick v. City of St. Louis, 127 Mo. 1, 29 S. W. 838; People v. Bradley, 207 N. Y. 592, 101 N. E. 766; U. S. v. Delaware & Hudson Co., 213 U. S. 366, 29 Sup. Ct. 527, 53 L. Ed. 836; Home Savings Bank v. Des Moines, 205 U. S. 5......