People ex rel. Strough v. Board of County Canvassers of Jefferson County

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtGRAY
CitationPeople ex rel. Strough v. Bd. of Cnty. Canvassers of Jefferson Cnty., 143 N.Y. 84, 37 N.E. 649 (N.Y. 1894)
Decision Date22 June 1894
PartiesTHE PEOPLE ex rel. PERRIN A. STROUGH, Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY CANVASSERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Respondent.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from supreme court, general term, fourth department.

Mandamus, on relation of Perrin A. Strough, to the board of county canvassers of Jefferson county, to recanvass votes. Order for peremptory writ reversed at general term. 28 N. Y. Supp. 871. Relator appeals. Affirmed.

STATUTES-REPEAL-LOCAL ACTS-RE-ENACTMENT.

1. Laws 1856, c. 179, s 16, providing that the supervisors of certain counties may divide such counties into school districts, as they deem advisable, is a local law, and is not impliedly repealed by Laws 1864, c. 555, providing generally that school districts shall continue as organized unless changed by the legislature, the two acts not being clearly inconsistent. 28 N. Y. Supp. 871, affirmed.

STATUTES-REPEAL-LOCAL ACTS-RE-ENACTMENT.

2. A statute which amends a former statute ‘so as to read as follows' is not invalidated by the fact that the amended statute had been repealed, but it is a re-enactment of such statute as amended. 28 N. Y. Supp. 871, affirmed.

John n. Carlisle, for appellant.

Watson M. Rogers, for respondent.

GRAY, J.

The relator, by this proceeding, has sought to compel a recanvass of the votes cast at the election held in November, 1893, for school commissioner of the third school commissioner's district in the county of Jefferson. His object is thereby to secure his election as a school commissioner, which would be accomplished, he alleges, if those votes were canvassed which were cast in the school district as its boundaries were fixed prior to 1892. In that year the board of supervisors of Jefferson county, at their annual meeting, undertook to change the boundaries of the different school commissioners' districts; and, if they had the power to do so, then it is not disputed but that their act was valid. That power was apparently given to them by the provisions of chapter 414 of the Laws of 1883; but the relator insists that that act of the legislature was ineffectual for the purpose claimed, because it was in amendment of a section of the common-school law, which had been repealed, either directly or by implication. The act passed in 183 was entitled ‘An act to amend section 16 of chapter 179 of the Laws of 1856, entitled ‘An act to provide for a more thorough supervision and inspection of common schools, and further to amend the statutes relating to public instruction in this state.’' It provided as follows: ‘Section 1. Sec. 16 of chapter 179 of the Laws of 1856, is hereby amended so as to read as follows: ‘Sec. 16. The several cities which already or which shall hereafter under special acts elect superintendents of common schools or whose board of education choose clerks doing the duty of supervision under the direction of the board of education, shall not be included in any commissioner's district created by this act or authorized to be formed by the board of supervisors; and the several boards of supervisors in counties in which such cities are joined to towns in the formation of an assembly district, may divide the county, exclusive of such cities, into school commissioners' districts as they may deem advisable, but no town shall be divided in forming such districts.’' Section 16 of chapter 179 of the Laws of 1856 had provided as follows: ‘The several cities in this state which under special acts already elect superintendents of common schools, or whose board of education choose clerks doing the duty of supervision under the direction of the board of education shall not be included in any school commissioner's district created by this act or authorized to be formed by the board of supervisors; and the several boards of supervisors in counties in which such cities are joined to towns in the formation of an assembly district, may divide the county, exclusive of such cities, into school commissioners' districts as they may deem advisable, but no town shall be divided in forming such districts.’ In 1864 the legislature passed an act (chapter 555, Laws 1864) in revision and consolidation of the general acts relating to public instruction; and section 2 of the second title, which treated of the election, powers, and duties of school...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Worthington v. District Court of Second Judicial Dist. in and for Washoe County
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 3 Julio 1914
    ... ... case we held that "an act creating a board of bank ... commissioners, defining their ... c. 555). The court, in People v. Canvassers, 143 ... N.Y. 84, 37 N.E. 649, ... 28, 98 ... Am. St. Rep. 73; State ex rel. Hagert v. Templeton, ... 18 N.D. 525, 123 N.W ... ...
  • State ex rel. Atlantic Horse Ins. Co. v. Blake
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 9 Febrero 1912
    ... ... Commonwealth v. Kenneson, 143 Mass. 418; People ... v. Canvassers, 143 N.Y. 84; State v ... 77, 107 S.W. 1064; McCully v. Board ... ...
  • Patton v. People ex rel. Sweet
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 23 Octubre 1907
    ...its purpose intelligibly and provided fully upon the subject? If it has, then the act is valid and must be upheld. People v. Canvassers, 143 N. Y. 84, 37 N. E. 649. See, also, to the same effect, People v. Onahan, 170 Ill. 449, 48 N. E. 1003. While said act of May 10, 1901 (Sess. Laws 1901,......
  • Commonwealth Ex Rel. City Of Richmond v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • 13 Enero 1916
    ...should be effective as the latest expression of the legislative will. People v. Onahan, 170 111. 449, 48 N. E. 1007; People v. Board, etc., 143 N. Y. 84, 37 N. E. 650; 36 Cyc. 1055. "Third. Closely related to the objection just considered is the allegation that the act of 1912 was unconstit......
  • Get Started for Free