People ex rel. Thomas v. Nixon, 21966.

• Citation: 353 Ill. 556,187 N.E. 650
• Decision Date: 21 October 1933
• Docket Number: No. 21966.,21966.
• Parties: PEOPLE ex rel. THOMAS, v. NIXON et al.
• Court: Supreme Court of Illinois

353 Ill. 556

187 N.E. 650

PEOPLE ex rel. THOMAS,

v.NIXON et al.

No. 21966.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Oct. 21, 1933.

Original petition by the People, on the relation of Kilner Fox Thomas, for a writ of mandamus to be addressed to George F. Nixon and another, commanding respondents, as members of Board of Appeals of Cook County, to convene as such Board and to vacate and expunge an order entered by such Board that assessment on certain classes of buildings in Cook County be reduced.

Writ awarded.

DE YOUNG and STONE, JJ., dissenting.

Scott MacLeish & Falk, of Chicago (Lester L. Falk and Leland K. Neeves, both of Chicago, of counsel), for petitioner.

Schuyler, Weinfeld & Hennessy and Wolf & Love, all of Chicago (George W. Lennon, Homer F. Carey, and Stephen Love, all of Chicago, of counsel), for respondents.

Otto Kerner, Atty. Gen. (Montgomery S. Winning, of Springfield, of counsel), amicus curiae.

JONES, Justice.

There has been filed in this court, upon leave granted, a petition in the name of the people, on the relation of Kilner Fox Thomas, a resident and taxpayer of Cook county, for a writ of mandamus commanding George F. Nixon and Fred W. Brummel, as members of the board of appeals of Cook county, to convene as such board and to vacate and expunge an order entered by that board on March 22, 1933, ordering a reduction of the assessment on certain classes of buildings in Cook county. The relator and respondents have entered into a stipulation that the sole question to be determined is whether or not the board of appeals had jurisdiction and power to enter the order which relator seeks to have vacated. The cause is submitted on the petition and stipulation.

On March 22, 1933, Thomas Harvatt filed with the board of appeals of Cook county a verified complaint alleging that he is the owner of a certain described lot in Chicago which is improved with a five-room brick bungalow; that the assessment on his bungalow for the year 1931 was excessive: that there was a lack of uniformity in the assessment for the year 1931 on income-producing and commercial property on the one hand, and on cottages, homes, bungalows, and two-flat and three-flat buildings on the other hand; that the base price used by the assessor in making the assessment on the latter class of property was excessive, and all of such property was assessed too high; and that a revision of the entire assessment of all real estate in Cook county was necessary. The complaint purported to be filed under the provisions of section 34 of the Revenue Act of 1898 as amended, and the prayer was ‘for a revision of the entire assessment, or a part thereof, of the 1931 real estate assessment.’ Without giving notice to the assessor and without a hearing on the complaint, the board of appeals on March 22, 1933, entered the order complained of, by which it directed the assessor of Cook county to revise the assessment on all cottages, bungalows, residences, homes, and two-flat and three-flat buildings by reducing the base price on which all assessments of such property was made by 15 per cent. The relator contends that the board of appeals was without jurisdiction or power to enter the order of March 22, 1933, and that that order is therefore void. On the other hand, the respondents contend that, by section 34 of the Revenue Act of 1898 as amended, the board of appeals was invested with jurisdiction and power to make the order.

The question presented in this case requires a consideration of the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1898 as amended by an act of the General Assembly approved and in force February 13, 1932. Laws of 1931-32. Special Sess. p. 65. By this amendatory law the board of assessors of Cook countywas abolished, and the powers theretofore exercised by such board were vested in the county assessor. Likewise the board of review of Cook county was abolished, and the board of appeals became the successor of the board of review, but all of the powers theretofore conferred upon the board of review were not vested in the board of appeals. Section 34 as amended by the amendatory act reads as follows:

‘§ 34. The board of review or in counties containing two hundred fifty thousand or more inhabitants the board of appeals shall meet on or before the third Monday in June in each year for the purpose of revising the assessment of property. At such meeting the board of review, or board of appeals, upon application of any taxpayer or, in counties of less than two hundred fifty thousand inhabitants, upon their own motion, may revise the entire assessment or any part thereof of any taxpayer and correct the same, as shall appear to them to be just, but in none of the cases provided for in this Act shall the assessment of the property of any person be increased unless such person or his agent, if either be a resident or has a place of business in the county, shall first have been notified in writing and been given an opportunity to be heard. Such meeting may be adjourned from day to day as may be necessary: Provided, that the final adjournment of said board of review or board of appeals shall be on or before the seventh day of September except as hereinafter providedin counties containing two hundred fifty thousand or more inhabitants and that no per diem compensation shall be paid any member of said board for services rendered after the date fixed for the final adjournment. Provided further, that in the five years next following the completion of a general reassessment of real property in any county containing two hundred and fifty thousand or more inhabitants, made pursuant to an order of the State Tax Commission such meeting for the purpose of revising the assessment of property shall be held on the Monday following the seventy-fourth day after the assessment books are required to be called for under section 11 of this Act, and the final adjournment of such board of appeals shall be on or before the one hundred and fiftieth day after the assessment books are required to be called for under section 11 of this Act; provided further, that in such five years the board of appeals at the time and place fixed and upon notice given as in this section provided, may hear complaints and review and correct any such assessments by towns or taxing districts, as the assessment for such towns and taxing district is completed and the books certified to the board of appeals by the assessor without waiting for the completion of the entire assessment of the county. The notice required by this section may provide for a revision and correction at the specified time of one or two or more town or taxing districts. The board of appeals at least one week before the meeting of such board of appeals to revise and correct the whole or any part of such assessment shall publish a notice of the time and place of its meeting for such purpose in at least one newspaper of general circulation published in the county, said notice to specify the date and place at which complaints may be filed and the towns or taxing districts the assessments of which will be considered for revision and correction at such time.’

The powers and duties of the board of appeals of Cook county are set forth in section 35a, which was added to the Revenue Act by the amendatory act. That section reads as follows:

Ԥ 35a. In counties containing two hundred fifty thousand or more inhabitants the board of appeals in any year shall

‘(a) On complaint that any property is over assessed or under assessed, or is exempt, review and order such assessment corrected;

‘(b) Order the county assessor to correct any mistake or error (other than mistakes or errors of judgment as to the valuation of any real or personal property) in the manner provided in section 35c of this Act; and

‘(c) Direct the county assessor to assess all property subject to assessment which he has not assessed, for any reason and enter the same upon the assessment books and to list and assess all property, real or personal, that has been omitted in the assessment of any year, or number of years, or if the tax thereon, for which such property was liable from any cause, has not been paid or if any such property, by reason of defective description or assessment thereof, fails to pay taxes for any year or years, in either case the same, when discovered by the board shall be listed and assessed by the county assessor and the board may order the county assessor to make such alterations in the description of real or personal property as it deems necessary.’

The method of procedure and the manner in which the board of appeals shall exercise the power conferred upon it by paragraph (a) of section 35a are set forth in section 35b, which was also added by the amendatory act. Section 35b reads as follows:

Ԥ 35b. In counties containing two hundred fifty thousand or more inhabitants, complaints that any particular property, real or personal, described therein is over assessed or under assessed or is exempt may be made by any taxpayer. All such complaints shall be in writing, shall be verified under the oath of the complaining party and shall be filed with the board of appeals in duplicate. The board of appeals shall forward one copy of each such complaint to the county assessor. In order to affect the assessment for the current year such complaints shall be filed on or before the first day of August, but if the assessment books containing the assessment complained of are not filed with the board of appeals by the twentieth of July, then such complaint shall be filed within ten days after such books are so filed with such board: Provided, that in the five years next following the completion of a general re-assessment of real property in any county containing two hundred and fifty thousand or more inhabitants, made pursuant to an order of the State Tax Commission, complaints of assessment of real property for any town or taxing district may be made at the time specified in...