People ex rel. Treasurer of Wayne County v. City of Detroit

Decision Date10 May 1869
Citation18 Mich. 445
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesThe People ex rel. the Treasurer of Wayne County v. The Controller of the City of Detroit

Heard May 10, 1869 [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]

Mandamus to B. G. Stimson, controller of the city of Detroit.

The following is the petition filed:

"Your petitioner, Paul Gies, respectfully represents and states to the court now here, that he is the duly elected and qualified treasurer of the county of Wayne, in said state, and that, being such treasurer, it becomes and is the duty of all officers and other persons who shall collect or receive any moneys on account of any fines for breaches of the penal laws and for penalties, to pay the same over to your petitioner within twenty days after the receipt thereof; that it is the duty of your petitioner to keep an accurate account of all such moneys paid to him, separate and distinct from all other accounts, and to credit the same to the library fund, and to account therefor to the board of supervisors of said county at each annual meeting of said board; and your petitioner further shows that it is also his duty as such treasurer, between the first and tenth days of April in each year, to apportion among the several townships in said county, according to the number of children therein between the ages of four and eighteen years, as shown by the last annual statement of the county clerk, on file in his office, all fines for any breaches of the penal laws and for penalties, or upon any recognizances in criminal proceedings, when collected and paid in to him.

"Your petitioner further shows, that as he is informed, and verily believes to be true, the central police station court, so-called, of the city of Detroit, is established and held under the provisions of an act 'entitled an act to revise the charter of the city of Detroit, approved February 5, 1857,' approved March 12, 1861, and also under an ordinance of the city of Detroit, passed March 6, 1866, to which said ordinance reference is made for certainty, and a copy whereof is hereto annexed, marked A.

"And your petitioner further shows, that said court held its first session, and first went into operation on the 2d day of April, A. D. 1866, and that since that time, and previous to the date hereof, large sums of money have been collected in said central police station court, in payment of fines imposed by said court for offenses tried and determined therein, and that said moneys were by the clerk of said central police station court paid in to Edward S. Leadbeater, the treasurer of the city of Detroit.

"And your petitioner shows that said Edward S. Leadbeater received, in his capacity as treasurer of said city, from the said clerk of said central police station court, being said fines aforesaid, the sum of eleven thousand and eighty-six dollars and twenty-five cents ($ 11,086.25).

"And your petitioner further shows, that it is by law the duty of Benjamin G. Stimson, controller of said city, to open and keep an account with the treasurer of said city, in which he shall charge the said treasurer of said city with all moneys raised or received for each of the several funds of said city; and it is made the duty of the treasurer of said city to report to the said controller, at the end of each month, the amount received and credited by him to each fund, and on what account received; and your petitioner further avers, that the aforesaid sum of eleven thousand and eighty-six dollars and twenty-five cents has been so reported by said city treasurer to said Benjamin G. Stimson, controller of said city of Detroit, together with the fund to which the same was credited, and that said city treasurer has been charged by said controller with said sum in his account with him.

"And your petitioner further shows, that on the 16th day of November, A. D. 1868, Emil P. Benoit, who was then county treasurer of said county, and the predecessor of your petitioner, was ready and willing to receive said moneys, and on said day duly and regularly demanded officially of said city treasurer, that he should pay over said moneys to such treasurer of Wayne county, as aforesaid; and also on the same day duly demanded of Benjamin G. Stimson, who is the controller of said city of Detroit, that he should draw his warrant in favor of such treasurer of Wayne county, upon said city treasurer, for the said moneys above stated. Your petitioner further states, that said city treasurer of said city of Detroit, after said demand, and on said 16th day of November, 1868, utterly refused to pay over said moneys to such treasurer of Wayne county, and that said Benjamin G Stimson, controller of said city, after said demand, and on said 16th day of November, 1868, utterly refused to draw his said warrant for said moneys upon said treasurer, and in favor of such treasurer of Wayne county.

"Your petitioner further represents, that said Edward S. Leadbeater, treasurer of said city, has no power to disburse said moneys, nor any of the funds in the city treasury, except upon a warrant signed by said Benjamin G. Stimson, controller of said city, and has, therefore, and for that reason, refused to pay over said moneys to your petitioner, without said warrant of said controller.

"And your petitioner further states, that he is advised and believes that he is entirely without remedy in the premises, unless it be afforded to him by the interposition of this honorable court, by their writ of mandamus, and he, therefore, prays that an order may be made requiring said Benjamin G. Stimson, controller as aforesaid, to show cause, within eight days after service on him of a copy of this petition, why a mandamus should not issue from this court, commanding him to draw his said warrant upon said Edward S. Leadbeater, city treasurer, in favor of your petitioner, for all moneys remaining in said Edward S. Leadbeater's hands from those received by him, for fines and penalties imposed in said central police station court of said city of Detroit, and that such other and further order may be had in the premises as justice may require."

The following is the ordinance referred to in the foregoing:

"An ordinance to prescribe the duties of the police justice in all cases of violation of city ordinances.

"It is hereby ordained by the common council of the city of Detroit:

"Section 1. It shall be the duty of the police justice to attend the city hall, or any other police station house where the lock-up shall be, on every day of the week, Sundays excepted, at the hour of seven o'clock a. m., to examine into, try and determine the case of every person confined in said station-house for vagrancy, disorderly conduct, or drunkenness, when the nature and circumstances of the case or complaint are such that the same may, and in the opinion of such justice, should be summarily disposed of without a jury. All other cases of persons so confined, and the cases of all persons whatsoever, arrested on warrant issued from the recorder's court, shall be tried and disposed of in the mode and manner now provided by law. Upon conviction of any person or persons for any of the offenses herein set forth, the police justice may commit him or her to the Wayne county jail, or to the Detroit house of correction, for not more than six months, and impose a fine not exceeding fifty dollars and costs, and in default of the immediate payment thereof, to commit such person or persons to the Wayne county jail, or to the Detroit house of correction, for a term not exceeding six months, or until such fine and costs be paid.

"Sec. 2. The police justice shall receive for his services in performing the duties required by the foregoing section the sum of two hundred dollars per annum.

"Sec. 3. It shall be the duty of the clerk of the police court to attend the city hall or any other police station house where the lock-up shall be, on every day of the week, Sundays excepted, at the hour of seven o'clock A. M., to keep a true record of the proceedings before the police justice at said station, in proper books to be provided therefor, and file and safely keep all papers pertaining to such proceedings; it shall be his duty to receive all costs, fines and dues of every description, from either party to complaints or prosecutions before said police justice, and which, by law, are taxable as justice's costs, and shall pay the same weekly to the city treasurer, and take his receipt therefor.

"Sec. 4. Said clerk shall receive as compensation for performing the duties specified in said section 3, the sum of two hundred dollars per annum.

"Sec. 5. This ordinance shall take effect from and after the first Monday in April next.

"Approved March 6, 1866."

The following is the answer of the defendant:

"This respondent, Benjamin G. Stimson, now comes by his attorneys Gray & Moran, and for answer to the said petition, and for cause why the writ prayed for should not be issued, says:

"He admits that, as charged in the said petition, said Gies is treasurer of the county of Wayne, and that it is the duty of all persons receiving or collecting money for fines or penalties for breaches of the penal laws to pay the same over to said treasurer, to be by him kept and applied as stated in the petition.

"But this respondent avers that the penal laws referred to are the general penal laws of the state, and do not mean breaches of the provisions of city ordinances of a limited and local application and intended merely for the better government of the city for and in which they are operative.

"He admits that the central police station court was established under the statute and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • People ex rel. Fennell v. Common Council of Bay City
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1877
    ...arisen in this court, the fines were collected for breaches of state laws, and not merely of ordinances passed under them.--17 Mich. 390; 18 Mich. 445; while the fines in question in case were collected for violations of mere city by-laws and ordinances. As to whether the same act may be an......
  • Belles v. Burr
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1889
    ...named as townships. People v. Wayne County Treasurer, 8 Mich. 392; County of Wayne v. City of Detroit, 17 Mich. 390; People v. Controller of Detroit, 18 Mich. 445. The legislature, in providing for the custody of placed them in the hands of the township boards of inspectors and the city boa......
  • Delta Cnty. v. City of Gladstone
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • April 6, 1943
    ...general laws of the state’, and numerous Michigan decisions are cited. Wayne County V. City of Detroit, 17 Mich. 390 and People v. Controller of Detroit, 18 Mich. 445, relied upon by the trial court, are distinguishable in that in those cases the fines collected were collected under a provi......
  • moundsville v. fountain.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1885
    ... ... the said defendant be imprisoned in the county jail of Marshall county, West Virginia, for the ... Augusta, 38 Ga. 342; Slaughter v. People, 2 Douglass 334; Welch v. Shncell, Doug. ; People v. Jackson, 8 Mich 110; Wayne County v. Detroit, 17 Mich. 390; People v. Detroit, 18 Mich. 445; Jefferson City v. Courtmain, 9 Mo. 692; Zyistra v. The ... Jones, 1 Wend. 261; Howe v. Treasurer of Plainfield, 37 K J. (8 Broom) 149: City of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT