People ex rel. Woodhaven Gaslight Co. v. Public Service Commission

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
CitationPeople ex rel. Woodhaven Gaslight Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of New York, 236 N.Y. 530, 142 N.E. 271 (N.Y. 1923)
Decision Date08 May 1923
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. THE WOODHAVEN GAS LIGHT COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department (203 App. Div. 369,196 N. Y. Supp. 623), entered November 17, 1922, which dismissed a writ of certiorari and confirmed the proceedings of the Public Service Commission in directing the relator to extend its gas mains and service in the Fourth ward of the borough of Queens, so as to reasonably serve with gas the residents of Locust Manor, Locust Lawn, South Jamaica Place, Springfield, and Laurelton. The Appellate Division found upon the record that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding that there was a necessity and a demand for the extension of the relator's service in question and that there was a duty upon the relator to supply the needs of the residents of the communities in question, if practicable, and on the review of all the evidence in the case it was shown that it was practicable for the relator to make the extension of the service in question and dismissed the writ of certiorari. On this appeal from the order dismissing said writ, the relator contended...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State ex rel. City of Wheeling v. Renick
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • October 18, 1960
    ...York ex rel. Woodhaven Gaslight Company v. Public Service Commission, 203 App.Div. 369, 196 N.Y.S. 623, affirmed without opinion, 236 N.Y. 530, 142 N.E. 271; Oklahoma Natural Gas Company v. Corporation Commission, 88 Okl. 51, 211 P. 401, 31 A.L.R. 330; Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company v. S......
  • Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 13, 1970
    ...People ex rel. Woodhaven Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission, 203 App.Div. 369, 370--371, 196 N.Y.S. 623, 624--625, affd. 236 N.Y. 530, 142 N.E. 271, affd. 269 U.S. 244, 46 S.Ct. 83, 70 L.Ed. 255). If the commission's determination has any rational basis for the conclusion arrived at......
  • People of the State of New York Woodhaven Gaslight Co v. Public Service Commission of New York
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1925
    ...and were there confirmed. 203 App. Div. 369, 196 N. Y. S. 623. The order of that court was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 236 N. Y. 530, 142 N. E. 271. The case is here under section 237 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § At the argument in this court, October 12, 1925, the commission sug......
  • People ex rel. Kernochan v. Law
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 8, 1923
    ... ... LAW, JR., et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission, Respondent. New York Court of AppealsMay 8, 1923 ... ...