People ex rel. Wynn v. Follette

Decision Date24 June 1968
Citation30 A.D.2d 706,291 N.Y.S.2d 912
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. William WYNN, Appellant, v. Harold W. FOLLETTE, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Albany, for respondent-respondent; Samuel A. Hirshowita, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Murray Sylvester, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel.

Before BRENNAN, Acting P.J., and HOPKINS, BENJAMIN, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 5, 1968, which dismissed the writ of habeas corpus herein, affirmed, without costs.

In view of the pendency of relator's appeal from the denial of his Coram nobis application, there was no reason of practicality and necessity to permit his attack on the judgment of conviction by habeas corpus (cf. People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257, 262, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 899, 220 N.E.2d 653, 654; People ex rel. Garcia v. Warden, Sing Sing Prison, 28 A.D.2d 682, 280 N.Y.S2d 754, lv. to app. den. 20 N.Y.2d 645, 285 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 231 N.E.2d 788; People ex rel. Blyden v. Denno, 28 A.D.2d 683, 282 N.Y.S.2d 451). Moreover, while it now appears to be well settled that statements made by an accused after arraignment and not in the presence of counsel are inadmissible as evidence (People v. Meyer, 11 N.Y.2d 162, 227 N.Y.S.2d 427, 182 N.E.2d 103; People v. Graham, 20 A.D.2d 949, 249 N.Y.S.2d 97), that rule is not to be applied retroactively (cf. People v. Howard, 12 N.Y.2d 65, 69, 236 N.Y.S.2d 39, 43, 187 N.E.2d 113, 116; People v. Rivera, 16 N.Y.2d 879, 264 N.Y.S.2d 249, 211 N.E.2d 649; People v. De Renzzio, 19 N.Y.2d 45, 277 N.Y.S.2d 668, 224 N.E.2d 97; People v. Clayton, 28 A.D.2d 543, 279 N.Y.S.2d 605).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Haynes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 24, 1968
  • People ex rel. Thomas v. Deegan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 12, 1969
    ...257, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653; People ex rel. Singleton v. Deegan, 31 A.D.2d 769, 297 N.Y.S.2d 637; People ex rel. Wynn v. Follette, 30 A.D.2d 706, 291 N.Y.S.2d 912; People ex rel. Cruz v. Deegan, 30 A.D.2d 976, 294 N.Y.S.2d BELDOCK, P.J., and CHRIST, RABIN, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, ......
  • People ex rel. Wynn v. Follette
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 1969
    ...1026 298 N.Y.S.2d 1026 23 N.Y.2d 644, 246 N.E.2d 540 People ex rel. Wynn v. Follette COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK Jan 15, 1969 291 N.Y.S.2d 912, 30 A.D.2d 706 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Denied. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT