People of State of California v. Bruce, 104.
Decision Date | 22 March 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 104.,104. |
Citation | 37 F. Supp. 811 |
Parties | PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. McCOLGAN, State Franchise Tax Adm'r, v. BRUCE. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nevada |
Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., of California, and Valentine Brookes and H. H. Linney, Deputy Attys. Gen., of California, for plaintiff.
Brown & Belford, of Reno, Nev., amici curiae.
A. P. Johnson, of Reno, Nev., for defendant.
This is an action to recover an amount of income tax in the sum of $4,345.84, alleged to have accrued in 1937, while defendant and his wife were residents of the State of California, by reason of defendant, then becoming entitled to the sum of $70,000, as the proceeds of a winning ticket in the so-called Irish Sweepstakes, payment therefor being subsequently made to defendant in the State of Nevada.
A primary question to be determined is that of jurisdiction. By the pleadings, the question of jurisdiction is presented in a number of respects. The amended complaint alleges: The answer denies these allegations excepting in respect to the citizenship of Charles J. McColgan and defendant.
As having a bearing on the question of jurisdiction, paragraph II of the amended complaint and the answer thereto are, also, here quoted:
The answer thereto reads:
The salient facts of the case are that in the year 1936, while defendant and his wife were residents of the State of California, defendant purchased, from his earnings, a ticket in the Irish Sweepstakes, which ticket later drew a horse. Thereafter defendant sold a half interest in the ticket to a New York Syndicate for $5,000. About May 26, 1936, the race was run and the horse drawn by the said ticket won first place entitling the holders of the ticket to the first prize of $150,000. Payment was not immediately made to defendant for his interest by reason of a suit instituted by one William Leathe in Ireland who, also, claimed a half interest in the winnings. This case was finally settled by an agreement that an amount be paid to Leathe and his attorneys in the sum of $10,642.84. In May 1937, not later than May 5th, defendant and his wife left the State of California and established their residence in Nevada, since which time they have continuously so resided and are now such residents.
Defendant, after...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Okl. Tax Commission v. Rodgers
... ... United ... States, 269 U.S. 492, 46 S.Ct. 180; California ex ... rel. McColgan v. Bruce, 37 F.Supp. 811, 813; Moore ... v ... Tax ... laws are not passed to punish people ... Nor can ... it be said that Missouri has a local ... ...