People v. El
Decision Date | 25 June 1998 |
Citation | 92 N.Y.2d 851,677 N.Y.S.2d 82 |
Parties | , 699 N.E.2d 442 People v. Rhagi El |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
El v. Artuz
... ... [A]s far as the gun charges, under the United States Constitution I cannot be charged with a felony because I'm not obligated to the United States Constitution ... And I don't believe that the people showed an intent as far as the assault in the second. And that's what I meant when I say that the jury was biased ... I'm not denying any guilt or anything like that. But I don't feel that the People showed the intent or suggested intent, but that's only an opinion ... ...
-
Rhagi v. Artuz
... ... His conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division on May 7, 1998, People v. El, 250 A.D.2d 395, 671 N.Y.S.2d 654 (1st Dep't 1998), and leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals was denied on June 25, 1998, People v. El, 92 N.Y.2d 851, 677 N.Y.S.2d 82, 699 N.E.2d 442 (1998) ... El filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 ... ...
-
Josephine F. v. (In re Starlaylah C.)
...advised the mother of the risks of self-representation (People v. El,250 A.D.2d 395, 396, 671 N.Y.S.2d 654 [1st Dept.1998], lv. denied92 N.Y.2d 851, 677 N.Y.S.2d 82, 699 N.E.2d 442 [1998]), and it had no obligation to assist the mother in litigating her defense (see e.g. Perez v. Time Movin......