People v. Allen, Docket No. 57532

Decision Date08 July 1976
Docket NumberDocket No. 57532
Citation397 Mich. 823,387 N.W.2d 925
PartiesPEOPLE v. Harold ALLEN. 397 Mich. 823, 387 N.W.2d 925
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Prior Reports: 59 Mich.App. 536, 229 N.W.2d 835; 79 Mich.App. 100, 261 N.W.2d 225.

Leave to appeal considered and pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of leave to appeal, the Court hereby remands the case to the trial court for resentencing only, at which time defendant shall be afforded his right of allocution. GCR 1963, 785.8(2). As to the remaining questions presented, the delayed application is hereby denied, because the appellant has failed to persuade the Court that the said questions should be reviewed by this Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People v. Martin
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • April 18, 1977
    ...Mich.App. 243, 256, 227 N.W.2d 303 (1975); People v. Allen, 59 Mich.App. 536, 540, 229 N.W.2d 835 (1975), remanded for resentencing, 397 Mich. 823 (1976). The next alleged error concerns the admission at trial of rebuttal testimony of an unendorsed police officer. The officer testified that......
  • People v. Saffold
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 30, 2001
    ...guilty plea hearing, that he has the right to be presumed innocent is error requiring reversal of the conviction. In People v. Allen, 397 Mich. 823, 387 N.W.2d 925 (1976), the defendant was not advised of the presumption of innocence, and, as a result, had his conviction set aside. In Peopl......
  • People v. Hart
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • September 18, 1987
    ...v. Duncan, 402 Mich. 1, 16-17, 260 N.W.2d 58 (1977); People v. Pomranky, 62 Mich.App. 304, 310-311, 233 N.W.2d 263 (1975), lv. den. 397 Mich. 823 (1976). Defendant also argues that error occurred because, on the redirect examination of Tony Frazier, a prosecution witness, the prosecutor eli......
  • People v. Moreno
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 31, 1982
    ...or arguments made by defense counsel, no error occurs. People v. Pomranky, 62 Mich.App. 304, 311, 233 N.W.2d 263 (1975), lv. den., 397 Mich. 823 (1976). During the cross-examination of Detective Daniel Duncan, the officer in charge of the investigation, defense counsel asked Duncan if he ha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT