People v. Alvarez
| Docket Number | B309269 |
| Decision Date | 14 February 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
-
People v. Wandrey
...assured." ( Maryland , at p. 850.) This public policy exception "must be applied on a case-by-case basis." ( People v. Alvarez (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 28, 36 ( Alvarez ).)A few California courts, considering trial conducted in the same time frame as Wandrey's, have recently issued opinions re......
-
People v. Kocontes
...policy exception is not a general one; it must be applied on a case-by-case basis. [Citations.]" ( People v. Alvarez (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 28, 35-36, 290 Cal.Rptr.3d 346 ( Alvarez ).) Our review is de novo. ( Id. at p. 36, 290 Cal.Rptr.3d 346.)"The ‘ultimate goal’ of the confrontation claus......
-
Smith v. State
...e.g., State v. Hunt, 293 A.3d 423, 432-33 (Me. 2023) (masking is slight impairment); People v. Alvarez, 75 Cal.App.5th 28, 290 Cal. Rptr. 3d 346, 352-54 (2022); State v. Jesenya O., 493 P.3d 418, 430-32 (N.M. Ct. App. 2021) (masking obfuscates two aspects of observation of witness demeanor)......
-
The People v. Kelley
...pandemic. Because there were no California published cases addressing whether the mask requirement violated the confrontation clause when Alvarez and Lopez were decided, both adopted and expanded upon the reasoning in numerous federal cases, which concluded that due to the substantial publi......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...People v. (1996) 14 Cal. 4th 155, 58 Cal. Rptr. 2d 385, §§2:190, 6:140, 6:160, 9:40, 9:50, 9:70, 9:80 Alvarez, People v. (2022) 75 Cal. App. 5th 28, 290 Cal. Rptr. 3d 346, §7:10 A&M Produce Co. v. FMC Corp. (1982) 135 Cal. App. 3d 473, 186 Cal. Rptr. 114, §15:10 Am-Cal Investment Co. v. Sha......
-
Witness examination
...Amendment to the federal Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant the following procedural safeguards [ People v. Alvarez (2022) 75 Cal. App. 5th 28, 37, 290 Cal. Rptr. 3d 346]: • In-person testimony. • Testimony under oath. • Cross-examination. • The ability of the defendant and the tr......