People v. Anderson

Decision Date11 May 1959
Citation8 A.D.2d 731,187 N.Y.S.2d 992
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Buster ANDERSON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Buster Anderson 54532, Auburn, in pro. per.

Edward S. Silver, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn, for respondent.

William I. Siegel, Brooklyn, of counsel.

In a coram nobis proceeding the appeal is from an order of the County Court, Kings County, denying appellant's application to vacate a judgment entered on his plea of guilty to the crime of attempted violation of section 1897 of the Penal Law (possession of a dangerous weapon as a felony), and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. The application was made on the ground that appellant's rights were violated in that at the time of his arrest police officers unlawfully searched his premises and seized a revolver and bullets therefrom. Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • New York Court of General Sessions
    • February 21, 1962
    ...post-conviction claim of illegal search and seizure.' People v. Seidenberg, Gen.Sess., 221 N.Y.S.2d 761. See, also, People v. Anderson, 8 A.D.2d 731, 187 N.Y.S.2d 998 (Memo.); People v. Angelet, Gen. Sess., 221 N.Y.S.2d As essential factors forming the background of my judgment of the quali......
  • People v. Upson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 23, 1963
    ...3 N.Y.2d 596, 601, 170 N.Y.S.2d 799, 804, 148 N.E.2d 139, 142; People v. Zito, 18 A.D.2d 668, 234 N.Y.S.2d 884; People v. Anderson, 8 A.D.2d 731, 187 N.Y.S.2d 992). Moreover, the remedy of coram nobis is not available as a substitute for an appeal (People v. Zito, supra; People v. DeGroat, ......
  • People v. Moore
    • United States
    • New York Court of General Sessions
    • February 19, 1962
    ...180 F.2d 413, cert. den. 339 U.S. 986, 70 S.Ct. 1008, 94 L.Ed. 1388; United States v. Salzano, 2 Cir., 241 F.2d 849; People v. Anderson, 8 A.D.2d 731, 187 N.Y.S.2d 992; Frank, Coram Nobis and 1960 Supp., page 96, n. In Mapp v. Ohio, supra, the decision turned upon the introduction of eviden......
  • People v. Seidenberg
    • United States
    • New York Court of General Sessions
    • July 31, 1961
    ...F.2d 413; United States v. Salzano, 2 Cir., 241 F.2d 849; Jones v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 326, 258 F.2d 420; People v. Anderson, 8 A.D.2d 731, 187 N.Y.S.2d 992; Frank, coram nobis, and 1960 Supp., page 96, n. 30-32). The other allegations set forth no grounds for coram nobis relief......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT