People v. Anderson
Decision Date | 20 March 2018 |
Docket Number | No. 1–15–0931,1–15–0931 |
Citation | 102 N.E.3d 786,2018 IL App (1st) 150931 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Corey ANDERSON, Defendant–Appellant. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Michael J. Pelletier, Patricia Mysza, and Patrick F. Cassidy, of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Chicago, for appellant.
Kimberly M. Foxx, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Alan J. Spellberg, Annette Collins, Matthew Connors, and Riebana E. Sachs, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.
¶ 1 On May 12, 2010, Corey Anderson and several companions (including codefendants Jabriel Anderson, no relation to Corey, and Jason Burns) went looking for Tomaras Qualls to fight him. The group saw a silver Monte Carlo pull up nearby, and Jabriel said, "That was them." Burns fired several times at the Monte Carlo. Qualls was not in the car, but Adam Martinez, Brian Lawson, and Robert Alvarado were, and Martinez was fatally shot.
¶ 2 The State sought to hold Corey accountable for the shooting based upon allegations that (i) the gun used in the shooting belonged to Corey, (ii) Corey threatened Qualls's mother earlier that evening, and (iii) when Jabriel pointed out the Monte Carlo, Corey reached for his gun before Burns grabbed it and fired. Following a jury trial, Corey was found guilty on an accountability theory of the first degree murder of Martinez, the attempted murder of Lawson and Alvarado, and aggravated discharge of a firearm at Lawson and Alvarado. Corey was sentenced to 95 years' imprisonment.
¶ 3 On appeal, Corey argues that he was denied a fair trial because (i) the State failed to prove up its assertion that Corey threatened Qualls, upon which it relied heavily in its argument to the jury, and (ii) the State improperly used prior consistent statements to bolster the credibility of Marquell Carter, the only witness who testified that Corey had a gun. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶ 5 On the evening of May 12, 2010, Xavier Smith was hosting a party at his home in Park Forest. Also present were Jabriel, Qualls, and Carter. Jabriel and Qualls got into an argument that escalated into a fistfight. Qualls left the party. He returned 10 to 15 minutes later with two friends and tried to convince Jabriel to come outside and fight them. Jabriel refused, whereupon Qualls and his friends left and did not return.
¶ 6 Jabriel made a phone call to his friend Raymond Darden, asking Darden to come pick him up. Later that evening, six individuals in two cars arrived, including Darden, who was accompanied by Corey (whose nickname was "Lord"), Burns, Cortez Robinson, Darden's girlfriend Latoya Kelly, and Burns's girlfriend Jasmine Johnson. The women stayed in the cars while the four men exited. Carter saw a gun in Corey's waistband. Jabriel ran outside to meet the group and told them about his earlier fight with Qualls. Then Jabriel, Corey, Burns, Darden, and Robinson walked to Qualls's house. At trial, Darden testified that he intended to mediate the conflict by talking to Qualls's brother, but in his earlier sworn testimony before the grand jury and at Burns's trial,1 he stated that the group went to fight Qualls.
¶ 7 According to Darden, when the five of them reached Qualls's house, Jabriel knocked on the door, and Qualls's mother answered. Darden claimed not to remember the conversation that followed. The State attempted to impeach him with his prior sworn testimony before the grand jury and at Burns's trial. Darden admitted stating before the grand jury that Jabriel said, "Tell your son I am going to f*** him up." The State then tried to elicit testimony about what Corey said:
On cross-examination, the defense also asked Darden about what Corey said:
¶ 8 After their confrontation with Qualls's mother, the five men left and walked back to Smith's house. As they neared Smith's house, a silver Monte Carlo drove past them and parked. Carter, standing in the doorway of Smith's house, heard someone say Carter saw Corey reach toward the gun in his waistband, but Burns snatched the gun from him and fired at the Monte Carlo.
¶ 9 Three days after the shooting, on May 15, 2010, Carter went to the Park Forest Police Department and identified Corey and Burns in photo arrays. On direct examination, the prosecutor presented Carter with the photo arrays and asked:
The prosecutor then showed Carter the photo array in which he identified Corey and asked:
The State displayed the photo arrays with Carter's annotations on a video screen for the jury to view, and Carter reconfirmed his handwritten statements about Corey and Burns.
¶ 10 On cross-examination, Carter admitted that on the day of the shooting, he was smoking marijuana, drinking, and taking ecstasy. The day after the shooting, Carter met with detectives and told them, falsely, that he did not know any of the people who came to reinforce Jabriel. Carter told the detectives that he saw a person with short hair shooting at the Monte Carlo (i.e. , Burns), but he did not tell them that Corey had a gun. The next day, May 14, Carter returned to the police station and said that he knew Darden and Robinson and that he saw a gun in Corey's waistband.
¶ 11 Carter appeared before the grand jury on May 17, but he asserted his fifth amendment right not to testify because he was on juvenile probation, and smoking and drinking violated the terms of his probation. On June 9, Carter appeared before the grand jury again and testified in exchange for immunity from prosecution for the probation violation.
¶ 12 Darden also testified about the shooting but claimed not to remember many of the details of what occurred. He was impeached with his prior sworn testimony, in which he said that when the Monte Carlo drove past, Jabriel said "That was them" and "Give me the cappa, give me the cappa" (i.e. , the gun). Around the same time, Darden saw Corey tugging at the waistband of his pants "as if he did have a pistol." At trial, Darden testified that he never actually saw Corey with a gun.
¶ 13 The Monte Carlo parked in the lot directly behind Smith's house. The group headed toward the car: Darden and Corey went around the right side of the house, while Jabriel, Burns, and Robinson took a more direct route through a gangway. Corey then reversed direction and went through the gangway with the others. Darden heard several gunshots and ran back to his car. The others came running back as well, and they got back in their vehicles and drove away. During the drive, Jabriel told Darden that Corey and Burns "let them n***** have it."
¶ 14 Jasmine testified that, as they drove away, she saw the black handle of a gun protruding from Burns's waistband. A few days after the shooting, Jasmine and Burns went to Corey's house, and Burns handed the same gun to Corey. On cross-examination, Jasmine stated that she saw Burns with that gun on one occasion prior to the shooting, when Burns put it under his mattress in his house.
¶ 15 Qualls was not in the silver Monte Carlo on the night of the shooting. Instead, the occupants were a group of friends who were not involved in the earlier fight between Jabriel and Qualls. Martinez was driving, Lawson was in the front passenger seat, and Alvarado and Andre Johnson were in the back. They were planning to go to Martinez's girlfriend's house, but first, they were planning to purchase marijuana from a friend in Park Forest. After Martinez parked the car, Alvarado noticed a group of individuals staring at them. "Who that?" he said. Lawson said, Martinez put the car into reverse. Immediately, gunshots rang out, shattering the passenger-side window. Lawson crouched down with his head between his knees. He shook Martinez's leg, saying, Martinez did not respond. Lawson looked up and saw Martinez bleeding profusely from a wound in the side of his head.
¶ 16 Lawson, Alvarado, and Andre fled the car on foot. Lawson ran to a nearby house and asked the people inside to call the police. Police and paramedics responded to the scene, and Martinez was brought to the hospital, where he died. An autopsy revealed that the cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head.
¶ 17 After the State rested, the defense moved for a directed verdict, which the trial court denied. The defense then stated:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ortega
...identification pursuant to section 115-12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Id. ¶¶ 41-42.¶ 74 People v. Anderson , 2018 IL App (1st) 150931, 422 Ill.Dec. 117, 102 N.E.3d 786, does not alter our conclusion. In Anderson , in addition to finding an error in the introduction of an unpr......
-
People v. Guerrero
...statements of identification for purposes of section 115-12 broadly so as to encompass the entire identification process. People v. Anderson , 2018 IL App (1st) 150931, ¶ 38, 422 Ill.Dec. 117, 102 N.E.3d 786. ¶ 79 We first address defendant's argument that Beltran's statement identifying de......
-
People v. Davis
...lends credibility to testimony that it might not otherwise deserve.’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [Citation.]" People v. Anderson , 2018 IL App (1st) 150931, ¶ 37, 422 Ill.Dec. 117, 102 N.E.3d 786 . "There are two distinct exceptions to this rule: (1) where the prior consistent state......
-
People v. Griffin
...does not apply to statements of identification. Beals , 162 Ill. 2d at 507-08, 205 Ill.Dec. 498, 643 N.E.2d 789 ; People v. Anderson , 2018 IL App (1st) 150931, ¶ 37, 422 Ill.Dec. 117, 102 N.E.3d 786. Accordingly, section 115-12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 ( 725 ILCS 5/115-12 ......