People v. Arredondo

Docket NumberH040980
Decision Date26 February 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • People v. Mason
    • United States
    • California Superior Court
    • December 29, 2016
    ...any, on this case of People v. Agnew (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 486 (Agnew ), and People v. Arredondo (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 186, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 563 (Arredondo ), before the grant of review in this latter case on June 8, 2016 (S233582), as well as Birchfield v. North D......
  • Commonwealth v. Myers
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 19, 2017
    ...instant matter, in that the defendant was unconscious at the time of a blood draw, the California Court of Appeal in People v. Arredondo , 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 563 (App. 2016), held that the defendant's unconsciousness rendered him incapable of manifesting voluntary consent to a blood draw, and ......
  • State v. Howes
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • March 1, 2017
    ...that the implied consent of an unconscious driver cannot justify a warrantless blood draw. See, e.g. , People v. Arredondo , ––– Cal.5th ––––, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 563, ––– P.3d –––– (2016), modified on denial of reh'g (Mar. 24, 2016), review granted , ––– Cal.5th ––––, 203 Cal.Rptr.3d 21, 371 P......
  • State v. McGee
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • May 14, 2021
    ...only when case-specific exigent circumstances prevent law enforcement officers from obtaining a warrant."); People v. Arredondo , 199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 563, 573 (Ct. App. 2016) ("[C]onsent of this kind cannot be characterized as ‘free[ ].’ " (alteration in original) (quoting People v. Michael ,......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Search and seizure
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Drunk Driving Law - Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • March 30, 2022
    ...a statute explicitly imputing consent to drivers would sustain a warrantless blood draw of its own force.” People v. Arredondo (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 186. §7:66.5(b)(i) Implied Consent Law Under VC §23612 VC §23612 is California’s main “implied consent” statute. Effective January 1, 2019, S......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Drunk Driving Law - Volume 1-2 Appendices
    • March 30, 2022
    ...Arndt (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 387, §§10:31.6, 10:34.2 People v. Arnold (1967) 66 Cal.2d 438, 448, §11:122.2.2 People v. Arredondo (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 186, review granted June 8, 2016, S233582, §§7:66.4, 7:66.4(a), 7:66.4(b), 7:66.5(b)(v)(2), 7:73.5(b), 7:73.5(b)1, 7:73.5(c) People v. Arreo......