People v. Asta
Decision Date | 05 October 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 73,73 |
Citation | 60 N.W.2d 472,337 Mich. 590 |
Parties | PEOPLE v. ASTA et al. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Frank G. Millard, Atty. Gen., Edmund E. Shepherd, Sol. Gen., Daniel J. O'Hara, T. Carl Holbrook, William B. Elmer, Assts. Atty. Gen., Joseph E. Killian, Pros. Atty., St. Joseph, for the People.
Charles W. Gore, Thomas N. Robinson, Sr., Benton Harbor, for appellees.
Before the Entire Bench.
Defendants in this case were arrested under a warrant charging them with criminal conspiracy to violate the provisions of P.A.1947, No. 265, P.A.1949, No. 312, and by P.A.1951, No. 78 1, commonly referred to as the cigarette tax act. An examination was duly held pursuant to the statute and defendants were bound over to the circuit court of Berrien County for trial. An information was filed which, on motion, was dismissed by the circuit judge hearing the matter. On leave granted the people have appealed from the order entered.
The statute cited was enacted for the purpose of imposing an excise and specific tax on the sale and distribution of cigarettes within this State. In order to facilitate the carrying out of such purpose, provisions were included for the regulation and licensing of persons engaged in the business of handling, selling and distributing cigarettes. The purpose of the legislature in the enactment of the statute clearly appears from the tile which, as amended by the act of 1951, above cited, reads as follows:
'An act to impose an excise and specific tax upon the sale and distribution of cigarettes in this state; to regulate and license manufacturers, wholesalers, vending machine operators, unclassified acquirers, transportation companies and retailers thereof, as herein defined; to prescribe the powers and duties of the Michigan department of revenue with respect thereto; to provide for the collection of such tax and the disposition thereof; to provide for the enforcement of this act; to make an appropriation and to prescribe penalties for the violation of this act'.
Section 1 defines the terms, used in the title, designating the various parties subject to regulation and licensing. Inasmuch as it is the claim of counsel for the appellant that the alleged conspiracy contemplated that defendants would, in the furtherance of their plans, have possession of cigarettes in this State as transporters and as unclassified acquirers, and would sell and make distribution thereof as such, the exact meaning of said terms becomes material. Section 1(6), as amended in 1951, defines 'unclassified acquirer' as follows:
"Unclassified acquirer' shall mean and include any person, other than a transportation company, who imports or acquires cigarettes for sale or distribution from a source located outside the state of Michigan other than a manufacturer, a wholesaler, a secondary wholesaler or a vending machine operator licensed under this act.' The definition of 'transporter' was added to the statute by the amendatory act as section 1(13) and reads as follows: "Transporter' shall mean any person importing or transporting into this state, or transporting in this state, cigarettes obtained from a source located outside the state of Michigan, or from any person not duly licensed under this act: Provided, That it shall not include an interstate commerce carrier licensed by the interstate commerce commission to carry commodities in interstate commerce, or a licensee maintaining a warehouse or place of business outside of Michigan when such warehouse or place of business is licensed under this act, or any person transporting no more than 4000 cigarettes at one time.'
Such definition should doubtless be read in connection with the provision of section 1(7) which provides that a transportation company 'shall mean and include any person operating, or supplying to a common carrier, cars, boats or other vehicles for the transportation or accommodation of passengers and engaged in the sale of cigarettes at retail.' It is a legitimate inference that the legislature has used the term 'transporter' as applying to one engaged in activities other than as a transportation company.
Other sections of the act relate to the granting of licenses and permits, to the renewal thereof, and to suspension or revocation for cause. The keeping of records by those engaged in the business is also prescribed. Section 6 imposes the following requirements applicable to transporters:
'Every transporter who shall transport or possess or acquire for the purpose of transporting any cigarettes upon the public highways, roads or streets of this state shall be required to have in his actual possession invoices or bills of lading containing the name and address of both the seller and the purchaser, the date of delivery, the name and address of the transporter, the quantity of cigarettes, the trade name or brand thereof, the price paid for each brand of cigarettes in such transporter's possession or custody and the license as prescribed under this act.
'Whenever any transporter transports any cigarettes into this state, such transporter shall stop at the nearest state police post within this state on the route authorized by the permit and disclose the cigarettes in his possession and the papers required to be in his possession by the provisions of this section.'
The making of returns to the State department of revenue and the payment of the specific tax imposed by the act, including such returns and payments by unclassified acquirers, are provided for in section 7, which reads as follows:
Penalties for violations of the act are set forth in section 9 thereof as amended in 1951. In accordance therewith the possession, acquiring, transportation, or offering for sale of cigarettes having a wholesale price in excess of $50, contrary to the provisions of the statute, is a felony. Such an act with reference to cigarettes having a value of $50 or less is declared a misdemeanor. Provision is also made for seizure and confiscation by the State department of revenue in case of a violation of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Hall
...is not probable cause for charging the defendant with the crime. M.C.L. Sec. 766.13; M.S.A. Sec. 28.931. See also People v. Asta, 337 Mich. 590, 611, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953): "[P]roofs on which to base the findings required by the statute must be introduced on a preliminary examination to just......
-
People v. Missouri
...341] in the unlawful agreement between two or more persons. People v. Smith, 296 Mich. 176, 295 N.W. 605 (1941); People v. Asta, 337 Mich. 590, 611, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953). Direct proof of agreement is not required, nor is it necessary that a formal agreement be proven. It is sufficient if th......
-
People v. Blume
...fails to realize that regardless of when jurisdiction is challenged, the Strassheim test must be met.10 See also People v. Asta, 337 Mich. 590, 611, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953); People v. Smith, 296 Mich. 176, 295 N.W. 605 (1941).11 An agreement to commit a particular crime cannot be prosecuted as......
-
People v. Johnson
...by the statute must be introduced at a preliminary examination to justify binding over to circuit court for trial. People v. Asta, 337 Mich. 590, 611, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953). Although at preliminary examination positive proof of guilt is not required, there must be some evidence on each eleme......
-
Privilege
.... 474 U.S. 1008, 106 S. Ct. 533, 88 L.Ed.2d 464 (1985); In re Terry W , 59 Cal.App.3d 745, 130 Cal.Rptr. 913 (1976). 77 People v. Asta , 337 Mich. 590, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953); see also People v. Ward , 226 Mich. 45, 196 N.W. 971 (1924). 78 U.S. v. Conforti , 200 F.2d 365 (C.A. Ill.) cert. den......
-
Privilege
.... 474 U.S. 1008, 106 S. Ct. 533, 88 L.Ed.2d 464 (1985); In re Terry W , 59 Cal.App.3d 745, 130 Cal.Rptr. 913 (1976). 74 People v. Asta , 337 Mich. 590, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953); see also People v. Ward , 226 Mich. 45, 196 N.W. 971 (1924). 75 U.S. v. Conforti , 200 F.2d 365 (C.A. Ill.) cert. den......
-
Privilege
.... 474 U.S. 1008, 106 S. Ct. 533, 88 L.Ed.2d 464 (1985); In re Terry W , 59 Cal.App.3d 745, 130 Cal.Rptr. 913 (1976). 74 People v. Asta , 337 Mich. 590, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953); see also People v. Ward , 226 Mich. 45, 196 N.W. 971 (1924). 75 U.S. v. Conforti , 200 F.2d 365 (C.A. Ill.) cert. den......
-
Privilege
.... 474 U.S. 1008, 106 S. Ct. 533, 88 L.Ed.2d 464 (1985); In re Terry W , 59 Cal.App.3d 745, 130 Cal.Rptr. 913 (1976). 74 People v. Asta , 337 Mich. 590, 60 N.W.2d 472 (1953); see also People v. Ward , 226 Mich. 45, 196 N.W. 971 (1924). 75 U.S. v. Conforti , 200 F.2d 365 (C.A. Ill.) cert. den......