People v. Aurigemma
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | People v. Aurigemma, 149 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956) |
| Decision Date | 14 February 1956 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fortunato AURIGEMMA, Appellant. |
Motion, 1 A.D.2d 789, 149 N.Y.S.2d 228, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without prejudice to an application to a judge of the Court of Appeals or to a justice of this court for certification that a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Marco v. Dulles
... ... People ex rel. Weiss v. Boyland, 1st Dept.1957, 3 A.D.2d 738, 160 N.Y.S.2d 235; Jacoby, Inc. v. Kushner, 1st Dept.1957, 3 A.D.2d 905, 162 N.Y.S.2d 657; ... ...
-
Marco v. Sachs
...from proceeding until after the examination before trial of the plaintiff, which order had been affirmed by the Appellate Division. 149 N.Y.S.2d 486. In reference to this point, it is a fact, as Judge Herlands pointed out on his opinion (177 F.Supp. at page 547), "The stay contained in the ......
- Erlanger v. Erlanger
-
Weinstock v. Long
... ... Board of Higher Education of City of N. Y., 260 App.Div. 9, 20 N.Y.S.2d 898, motion for leave to appeal denied 285 N.Y. 859, 31 N.E.2d 517; People ex rel. Sherrill v. Guggenheimer, 47 App.Div. 9, 62 N.Y.S. 11). The effect of this rule has been applied where a divergence of views has arisen ... ...
Get Started for Free