People v. Austin
Decision Date | 18 October 2019 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 123910 |
Citation | 2019 IL 123910,440 Ill.Dec. 669,155 N.E.3d 439 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Bethany AUSTIN, Appellee. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
State v. Casillas, A19-0576
...decision of the Vermont Supreme Court declining to recognize invasions of privacy as unprotected speech); People v. Austin , 440 Ill.Dec. 669, 155 N.E.3d 439, 454–55 (Ill. 2019) (explaining a similar decision by Illinois Supreme Court), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 233, 208 L.Ed......
- People v. Murray
-
People v. Rollins
...constitutional, and the party challenging the statute's constitutionality bears the burden of clearly showing its invalidity. People v. Austin , 2019 IL 123910, ¶ 14, 440 Ill.Dec. 669, 155 N.E.3d 439. Whether a statute is unconstitutional presents a question of law, subject to de novo revie......
-
Same Condition, LLC v. Codal, Inc.
...765-66, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994). The first amendment applies to the states through the fourteenth amendment ( People v. Austin , 2019 IL 123910, ¶ 30, 440 Ill.Dec. 669, 155 N.E.3d 439 ), and generally, it prohibits "the government from dictating what we see or read or speak o......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Constitutionality of sexually oriented speech: obscenity, indecency, and child pornography
...Porn, State Law, and Free Speech , 48 LOY. L.A. L. REV. 57, 97 (2014). 162. Rosenberg, supra note 159 at 202; see also People v. Austin, 155 N.E.3d 439, 474 (Ill. 2019); State v. Casilas, 952 N.W.2d 629, 642–47 (Minn. 2020). 163. Rosenberg, supra note 159 at 201–02. 164. Barton Gellman, Rec......
-
Commercial sexual exploitation: human sex trafficking & non-consensual pornography
...Application of Current Obscenity Standards—Revenge porn, 2 SMOLLA & NIMMER ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH (2022); see, e.g. , People v. Austin, 155 N.E.3d 439, 459 (Ill. 2019); State v. Katz, 179 N.E.3d 431, 447 (Ind. 2022); State v. VanBuren, 214 A.3d 791, 820 (Vt. 2019), as supplemented (June 7, 20......
-
A NEW COMPACT FOR SEXUAL PRIVACY.
...of First Amendment challenges. For an example of judicial refusal to strike down a law against nonconsensual porn, see People v. Austin, 155 N.E.3d 439 (Ill. 2019), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 233 (436.) See Richards, supra note 433, at 1167-68, 1185. (437.) Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S......
-
PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION IN PRIVACY LAW.
...not merely a privacy offense, but conceding that nonconsensual pornography is a privacy violation). (181.) See, e.g., People v. Austin, 155 N.E.3d 439, 466, 472 (Ill. 2019), cert, denied, 141 S. Ct. 233 (182.) One, unfortunately, may be the tendency for scholarship not squarely addressing g......
Request a trial to view additional results