People v. Barner

Decision Date21 June 1972
Citation39 A.D.2d 985,333 N.Y.S.2d 182
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne F. BARNER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Elbert H. Watrous, J., Schenectady County Dist. Atty., Schenectady(Philip Stillman, Schenectady, of counsel), for respondent.

William J. Quinlan, Schenectady, for appellant.

Before HERLIHY, P.J., and STALEY, SWEENEY, KANE and REYNOLDS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeals from a judgment of conviction of the County Court, Schenectady County, and from an order of the same court denying appellant's motion to vacate that judgment of conviction on the grounds it was procured by mistake or misrepresentation.

On June 18, 1971appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary in the third degree in full satisfaction of a pending indictment charging him with burglary in the third degree and petit larceny.On August 2, 1971appellant was sentenced to an indeterminate period not exceeding five years in the Clinton Correctional Facility.Appellant's position is that it was agreed by both the prosecutor and the Trial Judge that if he pleaded guilty he would only be sentenced to one year in the County Jail.His attorney in a sworn affidavit supports appellant's position.Of course, if such a commitment were made it was required to have been met (Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427).Nevertheless, the Trial Judge denied the motion to vacate the judgment of conviction without a hearing.There was no basis for the denial of a hearing solely on the ground...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
4 cases
  • People v. Selikoff
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 1974
    ...who had received the guilty plea (cf. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 263, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427, Supra; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182; see U.S. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society......
  • People v. Seminara
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 11, 1977
    ...v. Picciotti, 4 N.Y.2d 340, 175 N.Y.S.2d 32, 151 N.E.2d 191; People v. Weintraub, 41 A.D.2d 660, 340 N.Y.S.2d 675; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182). The hearing should be conducted before a County Court Judge other than the one who presided at the time the plea of guilty w......
  • People v. Davidson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 30, 1973
    ... ... (Cf. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427; People v. Scott, Supra; People v. Romano, 31 N.Y.2d 980, 341 N.Y.S.2d 313, 293 N.E.2d 561; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182.) Petitioner's failure to mention such promise at the time of sentence and in prior proceedings, though disturbing, does not preclude the relief sought. (People v. Esposito, 32 N.Y.2d 921, 347 N.Y.S.2d 70, 300 N.E.2d 438.) All the circumstances of the plea, ... ...
  • Taylor v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 21, 1972

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT