People v. Barner
Decision Date | 21 June 1972 |
Citation | 39 A.D.2d 985,333 N.Y.S.2d 182 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne F. BARNER, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Elbert H. Watrous, J., Schenectady County Dist. Atty., Schenectady(Philip Stillman, Schenectady, of counsel), for respondent.
William J. Quinlan, Schenectady, for appellant.
Before HERLIHY, P.J., and STALEY, SWEENEY, KANE and REYNOLDS, JJ.
Appeals from a judgment of conviction of the County Court, Schenectady County, and from an order of the same court denying appellant's motion to vacate that judgment of conviction on the grounds it was procured by mistake or misrepresentation.
On June 18, 1971appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary in the third degree in full satisfaction of a pending indictment charging him with burglary in the third degree and petit larceny.On August 2, 1971appellant was sentenced to an indeterminate period not exceeding five years in the Clinton Correctional Facility.Appellant's position is that it was agreed by both the prosecutor and the Trial Judge that if he pleaded guilty he would only be sentenced to one year in the County Jail.His attorney in a sworn affidavit supports appellant's position.Of course, if such a commitment were made it was required to have been met (Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427).Nevertheless, the Trial Judge denied the motion to vacate the judgment of conviction without a hearing.There was no basis for the denial of a hearing solely on the ground...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. Selikoff
...who had received the guilty plea (cf. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 263, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427, Supra; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182; see U.S. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society......
-
People v. Seminara
...v. Picciotti, 4 N.Y.2d 340, 175 N.Y.S.2d 32, 151 N.E.2d 191; People v. Weintraub, 41 A.D.2d 660, 340 N.Y.S.2d 675; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182). The hearing should be conducted before a County Court Judge other than the one who presided at the time the plea of guilty w......
-
People v. Davidson
... ... (Cf. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427; People v. Scott, Supra; People v. Romano, 31 N.Y.2d 980, 341 N.Y.S.2d 313, 293 N.E.2d 561; People v. Barner, 39 A.D.2d 985, 333 N.Y.S.2d 182.) Petitioner's failure to mention such promise at the time of sentence and in prior proceedings, though disturbing, does not preclude the relief sought. (People v. Esposito, 32 N.Y.2d 921, 347 N.Y.S.2d 70, 300 N.E.2d 438.) All the circumstances of the plea, ... ...
- Taylor v. State