People v. Barnes

Decision Date18 December 2013
Docket NumberNo. 1–11–2873.,1–11–2873.
Citation2013 IL App (1st) 112873,378 Ill.Dec. 50,3 N.E.3d 330
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Michael BARNES, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Michael J. Pelletier, Alan D. Goldberg, Levi S. Harris, State Appellate Defender's Office, Chicago, for appellant.

Anita M. Alvarez, State's Attorney, Chicago (Alan J. Spellberg, Mary P. Needham, Margaret M. Smith, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

OPINION

Justice MASON delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

¶ 1 Following a jury trial, defendant Michael Barnes was convicted of aggravated battery of a child and sentenced to 30 years in prison with a 3–year period of mandatory supervised release. On appeal, Barnes contends that the circuit court erred in (1) barring Barnes from questioning the victim's mother about her children being removed from her custody and her arrests for prostitution, (2) allowing the State to introduce evidence of the victim's liver contusion where the State did not show that the injury resulted from a crime in which Barnes participated, and (3) allowing the State to show the jury the victim's actual injuries to establish the element of permanent disfigurement. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County and remand for a new trial.

¶ 2 BACKGROUND

¶ 3 In July 2009, Felice Toney lived in a basement apartment at 5204 South Honore Street in Chicago with her two-year-old son, K.T., and Barnes. Toney had not lived in the apartment for very long and did not know Barnes before she moved into the apartment. Toney also had an infant daughter who was living with the baby's father at the time Toney and K.T. were living in the basement apartment on Honore.

¶ 4 The owner of the house on Honore lived on the first floor with his daughter Denise, her boyfriend and their two children, and his daughter Shawanda and her eight children. Shawanda's children were between the ages of 2 and 12, and Denise had a 2-year-old and an infant. Toney knew Denise through mutual friends.

¶ 5 The basement apartment consisted of an open space with a pull-out couch, a second couch, and an area separated by a partial wall with a twin bed. Pit bulls were kept in a fenced-off area of the apartment. There were no kitchen facilities. There was a bathroom with a sink, toilet and shower, but the shower did not work. To bathe K.T., Toney would fill the bathroom sink with soap and water and give K.T. a sponge bath.

¶ 6 On the afternoon of July 19, 2009, Toney watched three movies in the basement apartment with K.T. and two of the young children who lived upstairs. It was hot in the basement, and K.T. was dressed in a diaper and T-shirt. At approximately 9:30 p.m., Toney left the apartment to go out with friends. Barnes agreed to take care of K.T. as long as Toney returned by 9 a.m. the following day so that he could go to work.

¶ 7 When Toney returned to the apartment at approximately 8:30 a.m. on July 20, Barnes and Denise were in the apartment talking. Toney sat on the couch and noticed that K.T. was lying on the pull-out couch in a position with his arms bent at the elbows underneath his torso, his fists up by his shoulders, and his knees drawn up so that his bottom was in the air. K.T. had his face turned toward the wall, apparently sleeping. Denise's boyfriend came into the apartment and the adults talked for five more minutes.

¶ 8 Denise and her boyfriend then left and Toney noticed that K.T. was looking at her and that he was shaking. Barnes picked K.T. up and sat him on Toney's lap. Toney patted K.T.'s bottom and realized he was not wearing a diaper and started unzipping the sleeper he was wearing so she could put a diaper on him.

¶ 9 Toney pulled the sleeper down and saw that K.T.'s skin was shiny and white and that his back appeared to be melted and peeling and was covered in blisters and boils. Toney asked Barnes what happened and Barnes said that he had bathed K.T. and maybe the water was too hot. Toney wrapped K.T. in a blanket, took him outside, and called her grandmother who lived nearby to take them to the hospital.

¶ 10 Toney's grandmother drove them to Provident Hospital, where doctors inserted an IV and transferred K.T. to Stroger Hospital by ambulance. The doctors at Stroger began treating K.T. immediately, cutting off boils and dead skin. The skin on the entire midsection of K.T.'s back, extending down his back and including the skin on his buttocks, was gone. K.T. had boils on his shoulders, his legs were raw, and boils went down to the top of his feet.

¶ 11 Additional tests were ordered, including liver and pancreatic enzyme tests. K.T.'s liver enzymes were extremely high, an indication of a possible internal abdominal injury . A CT scan revealed a contusion or bruise on the left lobe of K.T.'s liver.

¶ 12 Chicago police officers spoke to Toney at the hospital and she told them what Barnes had said about bathing K.T. Later that afternoon, three detectives went to 5204 South Honore to pick Barnes up for questioning. The detectives located Barnes outside the residence and transported him to the police station. The detectives advised Barnes of his Miranda rights, and Barnes indicated that he would waive his right to remain silent and would answer their questions.

¶ 13 Barnes told the detectives that he was washing some clothes in a plastic tote at approximately 5:30 a.m. when he smelled something. Barnes noticed that K.T., who was in bed, “was shitty and wet” and the bed was wet. Barnes took K.T. from the bed and took him into the bathroom, where he soaped him up and put him in the plastic container he had been using to wash the clothes. Barnes gave conflicting statements about whether K.T. was seated or standing in the container. Barnes then used a smaller plastic container to pour water over K.T. to wash the soap off while K.T. was still in the plastic tote. Barnes said that he mixed the hot and cold water and used that water to rinse K.T.

¶ 14 Barnes told the detectives that K.T. cried and struggled to get out of the tote, but that he “was determined to keep him in the tub” in order to rinse the soap off his body. Barnes said that he realized the water he used to pour over K.T. was hot, but he did not know how hot it was. After the bath, which lasted for five minutes or longer, Barnes dressed K.T. in a zip-up sleeper without a diaper.

¶ 15 On August 6, 2009, Barnes was charged by information with one count of attempted first degree murder, three counts of aggravated battery of a child, and three counts of heinous battery. Barnes proceeded to trial on two counts of aggravated battery and one count of heinous battery.

¶ 16 Prior to trial, the State moved to prohibit Barnes from eliciting evidence regarding Toney's two arrests for prostitution or her involvement with the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) and the fact that she no longer had custody of her children. The trial court granted the motion to exclude evidence of prostitution, finding that the probative value of Toney's arrests for prostitution was far outweighed by the prejudicial effect of the evidence, where the evidence showed that Toney was not present when K.T. was injured and both arrests occurred after the injury. The trial court also granted the motion to exclude evidence of Toney's involvement with DCFS on hearsay grounds. The trial court clarified that if there was anything in the DCFS records regarding Toney's statements about the incident with K.T. that conflicted with her testimony, the defense could ask her about it.

¶ 17 Barnes moved in limine to prohibit the State from presenting evidence of K.T.'s liver contusion and from presenting K.T. in person to the jury to demonstrate the permanent disfigurement element of its case. The trial court found that evidence of the liver contusion was relevant to the issue of whether Barnes intentionally harmed K.T. and ruled that the State could present such evidence. The trial court also found that the probative value of the jury seeing the actual physical results of the scalding in evaluating the issue of permanent disfigurement outweighed any prejudicial effect, and ruled that the State could present K.T. in person and show his injuries to the jury.

¶ 18 At trial, Detective Pamela Laughlin testified that she was one of the detectives who interviewed Barnes on July 20, 2009. Detective Laughlin did not observe any injuries on Barnes's hands. She later returned to the apartment with another detective who measured the temperature of the water in the bathroom sink and determined that it was 126 degrees.

¶ 19 Toney testified that she had lived in the basement apartment for three or four months prior to the incident involving K.T. and that she had not known Barnes when she moved in. She stated that it was just a temporary living situation and that she had previously lived with the father of her infant daughter but moved out because he was abusing her. Toney confirmed that her daughter did not live with her at the residence on Honore. During the time she lived in the basement apartment, Toney had seen Barnes change K.T.'s diaper and wash him in the bathroom with a washcloth while K.T. was standing next to the sink. Toney had never seen Barnes bathe K.T. in a plastic container.

¶ 20 Barnes would watch K.T. three or four times a week while Toney was out of the apartment. Barnes had Toney's cell phone number and, although he did not have his own phone, he would use someone else's phone to call her when she was out if he needed something. On the night of July 19–20, Toney did not receive any calls from Barnes.

¶ 21 After Toney arrived home the morning of July 20 and Denise and her boyfriend left the apartment, Barnes seemed to be agitated and in a rush. When Toney realized K.T. was not asleep as she originally thought when she entered the apartment, she said, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Bates
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 27, 2018
    ...Conversely, although this evidence was certainly harmful to defendant's case, we do not view it as unfairly prejudicial. People v. Barnes , 2013 IL App (1st) 112873, ¶ 44, 378 Ill.Dec. 50, 3 N.E.3d 330 (unfair prejudice means an improper basis upon which to make a decision such as emotion, ......
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 26, 2014
    ...trial court and we will not reverse absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion resulting in prejudice to the defendant. People v. Barnes, 2013 IL App (1st) 112873, ¶ 41, 378 Ill.Dec. 50, 3 N.E.3d 330. An abuse of discretion occurs where “the trial court's ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, u......
  • People v. Meredith, 4-13-0725
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 12, 2015
    ...of this testimony to explain the false statements defendant made to the police approximately seven months earlier. See People v. Barnes, 2013 IL App (1st) 112873, ¶ 41, 3 N.E.3d 330 ("Evidence is considered relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequ......
  • People v. Floyd
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 11, 2014
    ...to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly an emotional one, such as sympathy, hatred, contempt, or horror.” ’ ” People v. Barnes, 2013 IL App (1st) 112873, ¶ 44, 378 Ill.Dec. 50, 3 N.E.3d 330 (quoting People v. Eyler, 133 Ill.2d 173, 218, 139 Ill.Dec. 756, 549 N.E.2d 268 (1989), qu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT