People v. Beck

• Decision Date: 04 May 2018
• Docket Number: SC: 152934,COA: 321806
• Parties: PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Lamontee BECK, Defendant-Appellant.
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court

910 N.W.2d 298 (Mem)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.Eric Lamontee BECK, Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 152934

COA: 321806

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 4, 2018

Order

By order of September 6, 2016, the application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the motion to appoint counsel were held in abeyance pending the decisions in People v. Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v. Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946-8). On order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich. 453, 902 N.W.2d 327 (2017), the application and motion are again considered. The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED as moot. The defendant is represented in this Court by attorney Michael Skinner, who filed the application on the defendant’s behalf.

We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order, addressing: (1) the appropriate basis for distinguishing between permissible trial court consideration of acquitted conduct, see People v. Ewing (After Remand) , 435 Mich. 443, 451-452, 458 N.W.2d 880 (1990) (opinion by BRICKLEY, J. ); id . at 473, 458 N.W.2d 880 (opinion by BOYLE, J. ); see also United States v. Watts , 519 U.S. 148, 117 S.Ct. 633, 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997), and an impermissible "independent finding of defendant’s guilt" by a trial court on an acquitted charge, see People v. Grimmett , 388 Mich. 590, 608, 202 N.W.2d 278 (1972), overruled on other grounds by People v. White , 390 Mich. 245, 258, 212 N.W.2d 222 (1973) ; see also People v. Fortson , 202 Mich. App. 13, 21, 507 N.W.2d 763 (1993) ; and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion by departing from the guidelines range, where the jury acquitted the defendant of murder, but the court departed based on its finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant had perpetrated the killing. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by ...