People v. Belile

Decision Date24 March 2016
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph J. BELILE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

137 A.D.3d 1460
27 N.Y.S.3d 738

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Joseph J. BELILE, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

March 24, 2016.


27 N.Y.S.3d 739

Susan Patnode, Rural Law Center of New York, Castleton (Cynthia Feathers of counsel), for appellant.

Alexander Lesyk, Special Prosecutor, Norwood, for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, LYNCH, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ.

LYNCH, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered September 2, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

Following an altercation at the St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility on August 13, 2013 between defendant, an inmate and another inmate, defendant was indicted for assault in the second degree. The victim died of unrelated causes prior to trial and defendant's ensuing trial resulted in a hung jury. On the day scheduled for the retrial, defendant accepted a plea agreement that included a waiver of appeal, whereby he pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted assault in the second degree. The plea agreement also satisfied several unrelated pending or potential criminal charges for which defendant was in and out of jail throughout 2013, and required restitution for each matter. Defendant was thereafter sentenced, consistent with the plea agreement, to a prison term of 2 to 4 years, as an admitted second felony offender, restitution was ordered and orders of protection were issued. Defendant now appeals.

Initially, contrary to defendant's contentions, we find that his combined oral and written waiver of appeal was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 339–341, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 [2015] ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; cf. People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 [2011] ). The minutes of the plea proceedings reflect that when the terms of the plea agreement were outlined, County Court specified that an appeal waiver was a condition of the deal, and defendant confirmed that he understood the terms and thereafter agreed, without qualification, that he was voluntarily waiving his right to appeal. The court ascertained that defendant understood that he was giving up his right to appeal, explained the appellate rights that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • People v. Turner, 107752
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 8, 2018
    ...was a condition of the plea agreement (see People v. Bateman , 151 A.D.3d 1482, 1483, 59 N.Y.S.3d 159 [2017] ; People v. Belile , 137 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 27 N.Y.S.3d 738 [2016] ), and, during the plea colloquy, County Court distinguished the right to appeal from the trial-related rights auto......
  • People v. Hopper
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 10, 2017
    ...counsel, understood the terms and was voluntarily waiving his right to appeal as part of the plea bargain (see People v. Belile, 137 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 27 N.Y.S.3d 738 [2016] ). County Court further ascertained that defendant understood that he was giving up his right to appeal, explained t......
  • People v. Howe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 4, 2017
    ...forfeited by his guilty plea (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d at 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Belile, 137 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 27 N.Y.S.3d 738 [2016] ). Defendant then signed a written waiver of appeal in open court that outlined the issues that survive the appeal waiver a......
  • People v. Ortiz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 9, 2017
    ...Consequently, the valid appeal waiver precludes defendant's challenge to the sentence as harsh and excessive (see People v. Belile, 137 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 27 N.Y.S.3d 738 [2016] ; People v. Neiles, 128 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 7 N.Y.S.3d 913 [2015] ; People v. Banks, 122 A.D.3d 953, 954, 994 N.Y.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT