People v. Bell

Decision Date15 March 2011
Citation919 N.Y.S.2d 76,82 A.D.3d 997,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 02023
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Earl BELL, Jr., appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

82 A.D.3d 997
919 N.Y.S.2d 76
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 02023

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Earl BELL, Jr., appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

March 15, 2011.


[919 N.Y.S.2d 77]

Richard N. Lentino, Middletown, N.Y., for appellant.Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

[82 A.D.3d 997] Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), rendered July 28, 2008, convicting him of murder in the second degree (depraved indifference murder), murder in the second degree (felony murder), kidnapping in the first degree, and tampering with physical evidence, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant and a codefendant, Monroe B. Bussey, who was tried separately, were indicted for crimes related to their beating of Jeffrey Beary (hereinafter the victim) in an alley leading to the backyard of the defendant's home. During the beating, which lasted up to 20 minutes, the victim sustained multiple blows, abrasions and lacerations to the head, a fractured collarbone, three fractured ribs, and a punctured lung that caused air to enter his chest cavity. The victim was stripped [82 A.D.3d 998] of his clothing and his head was wrapped in a blanket secured with tape. The victim, while moaning, was placed into the trunk of Bussey's car, driven approximately 18 miles from Newburgh to Poughkeepsie, and dumped in a shallow creek. The Medical Examiner testified that the victim vomited inside the blanket and had lived for an hour or two after aspirating his gastric contents.

The defendant's arrest was based on probable cause, as an identified citizen accused the defendant of participating in the instant homicide ( see People v. Mendoza, 49 A.D.3d 559, 560, 853 N.Y.S.2d 364; People v. Griffin, 15 A.D.3d 502, 790 N.Y.S.2d 494; People v. Soto, 279 A.D.2d 592, 719 N.Y.S.2d 603; People v. Martin, 221 A.D.2d 568, 568–569, 634 N.Y.S.2d 147; People v. Pagan, 184 A.D.2d 738, 585 N.Y.S.2d 453). Furthermore, that same citizen identified the defendant's photograph from a computer-generated photo array shown to her by a detective, which provided the police with an additional basis to arrest the defendant ( see People v. Medina, 293 A.D.2d 553, 742 N.Y.S.2d 64; People v. Palacio, 121 A.D.2d 282, 503 N.Y.S.2d 56).

The jury acquitted the defendant of intentional murder ( see Penal Law § 125.25[1] ), but convicted him of, among other things, depraved indifference murder

[919 N.Y.S.2d 78]

( see Penal Law § 125.25[2] ). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as we must ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that this case falls within the small and finite category of cases where the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of the crime of depraved indifference murder. On these facts, there is a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences by which a rational jury could have determined that the defendant, while not intending to kill, acted with the conscious objective of engaging in “torture or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Shepard
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 13 Abril 2016
    ...seized incident to the defendant's lawful arrest (see People v. Verges, 120 A.D.3d 1028, 1029, 991 N.Y.S.2d 766 ; People v. Bell, 82 A.D.3d 997, 998, 919 N.Y.S.2d 76, mod. 21 N.Y.3d 915, 966 N.Y.S.2d 773, 988 N.E.2d 1285 ; People v. Freeman, 283 A.D.2d 518, 724 N.Y.S.2d 487 ; People v. Paga......
  • People v. Barley
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 15 Marzo 2011
    ...from him” ( People v. Castro, 73 A.D.3d 800, 801, 899 N.Y.S.2d 653; see People v. Henderson, 57 A.D.3d 562, 868 N.Y.S.2d 299). [82 A.D.3d 997] Moreover, the credibility determinations of a hearing court are accorded deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported b......
  • Chan v. Y & Dev. Corp..
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 15 Marzo 2011
    ...argument that [82 A.D.3d 944] they are entitled to an award of summary judgment based on a search of the record (CPLR 3212[b] ). [919 N.Y.S.2d 76] The plaintiffs' own submissions include averments to the effect that their alleged maintenance of “the entire alleyway,” including the three-foo......
  • People v. Bell
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • 10 Enero 2013
    ...Slip Op. 60593The PEOPLE etc., Respondent,v.Earl BELL, Jr., Appellant.Court of Appeals of New York.Jan. 10, 2013. *761Reported below, 82 A.D.3d 997, 919 N.Y.S.2d 76. *762Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Alex Smith, Esq., 6 North Street, Middletown, N.Y. 10940 assigned as counsel......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT