People v. Benedict

Decision Date07 October 1986
Citation68 N.Y.2d 832,508 N.Y.S.2d 175
Parties, 500 N.E.2d 873 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald BENEDICT, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Prior report: 115 A.D.2d 795, 495 N.Y.S.2d 735.

Order affirmed.The only issue raised by appellant can not be reviewed by this Court because not preserved (CPL 470.05).

WACHTLER, C.J., and MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JJ., concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • People v. Udzinski
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 17, 1989
    ...52 N.Y.2d 781, 783, 436 N.Y.S.2d 620, 417 N.E.2d 1008 [unconstitutionality of criminal statute, due process]; People v. Benedict, 68 N.Y.2d 832, 508 N.Y.S.2d 175, 500 N.E.2d 873 [due process right to fair trial]; People v. Thomas, supra [Sandstrom error]; People v. Miguel, 53 N.Y.2d 920, 92......
  • People v. Abrams
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 6, 2010
    ...court to confer immunity ( see CPL 50.20[2]; 50.30; People v. Benedict, 115 A.D.2d 795, 796, 495 N.Y.S.2d 735, affd 68 N.Y.2d 832, 508 N.Y.S.2d 175, 500 N.E.2d 873 [1986], cert. denied 480 U.S. 937, 107 S.Ct. 1582, 94 L.Ed.2d 772 [1987] ), the District Attorney's statement here did not conf......
  • Benedict v. Henderson, 87-CV-1019.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • October 10, 1989
    ...only issue raised by appellant cannot be reviewed by this Court because not preserved (C.P.L. 470.052). People v. Benedict, 68 N.Y.2d 832, 833, 508 N.Y.S.2d 175, 500 N.E.2d 873 (1986). A motion for reargument on this point was denied without opinion. 68 N.Y.2d 998, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1029, 503 N.......
  • People v. White
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 3, 1989
    ...40 N.Y.2d 953, 954, 390 N.Y.S.2d 410, 358 N.E.2d 1035; People v. Benedict, 115 A.D.2d 795, 796, 495 N.Y.S.2d 735, affd. 68 N.Y.2d 832, 508 N.Y.S.2d 175, 500 N.E.2d 873; People v. Shirley, 123 A.D.2d 407, 506 N.Y.S.2d 718, app. denied 69 N.Y.2d 750, 512 N.Y.S.2d 1054, 505 N.E.2d 253; People ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT