People v. Berger
| Decision Date | 17 March 1966 |
| Citation | 269 N.Y.S.2d 368,25 A.D.2d 718 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ralph BERGER, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
J. B. McKenna, New York City, for respondent.
J. E. Brill, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Berger v. State of New York
... ... In 1934 the Congress outlawed the interception without authorization, and the divulging or publishing of the contents of wiretaps by passing § 605 of the Communications Act of 1934. 3 New York, in 1938, declared by constitutional amendment that "(t)he right of the people to be secured against unreasonable interception of telephone and telegraph communications shall not be violated," but permitted by ex parte order of the Supreme Court of the State the interception of communications on a showing of "reasonable ground to believe that evidence of crime" might be ... ...
- People v. Berger
- People v. Berger