People v. Bethea

Decision Date02 April 2009
Docket Number101808.
Citation2009 NY Slip Op 02488,874 N.Y.S.2d 920,61 A.D.3d 1016
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAHIIM BETHEA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County(Hoye, J.), rendered April 29, 2008, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

KANE, J.

To satisfy an 11-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (seePenal Law § 265.02 [4]).He waived his right to appeal and County Court sentenced him to 3½ years in prison with postrelease supervision.Defendant appeals.

Penal Law § 265.02 (4) was repealed effective November 1, 2006, several months before this indictment was handed up (see L 2006, ch 742, § 1).Defendant thus pleaded guilty to a nonexistent crime, based on a jurisdictional defect in the indictment and this survives his guilty plea and waiver of appeal (seePeople v Case,42 NY2d 98, 100[1977];People v Lopez,45 AD3d 493, 494[2007]).Despite defendant's failure to raise the issue in his appellate brief, we reverse his judgment of conviction and dismiss that count of the indictment (seePeople v Davis,193 AD2d 954, 956[1993];see alsoPeople v Lopez,45 AD3d at 494).

MERCURE, J.P., PETERS, LAHTINEN and MALONE Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, plea vacated, count two of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • People v. Adams
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 28, 2022
    ...36 N.Y.3d 1097, 144 N.Y.S.3d 142, 167 N.E.3d 1277 [2021] ), and is not forfeited by a guilty plea (see People v. Bethea , 61 A.D.3d 1016, 1017, 874 N.Y.S.2d 920 [3d Dept. 2009] ; Rucinski , 24 A.D.3d at 1173, 808 N.Y.S.2d 511 ; Roe , 191 A.D.2d at 845, 595 N.Y.S.2d 121 ). We are obligated t......
  • People v. McCann
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 5, 2015
    ...588, 589, 505 N.Y.S.2d 272 [1986], lv. denied 68 N.Y.2d 810, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1027, 499 N.E.2d 876 [1986] ; see also People v. Bethea, 61 A.D.3d 1016, 1017, 874 N.Y.S.2d 920 [2009] ). Defendant next contends that his statement to investigators should have been suppressed because a martial arts ......
  • People v. Garcia
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 9, 2010
    ...indictment ( see L. 2006, ch. 742, § 1), count 2 was jurisdictionally defective, requiring its dismissal ( see People v. Bethea, 61 A.D.3d 1016, 1017, 874 N.Y.S.2d 920 [2009] ). As such, defendant's conviction of said count must be reversed. With regard to defendant's pretrial motion to sup......
  • People v. Stone
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 12, 2015
    ...920, 923, 844 N.Y.S.2d 478 [2007], lv. denied 10 N.Y.3d 764, 854 N.Y.S.2d 326, 883 N.E.2d 1261 [2008] ; compare People v. Bethea, 61 A.D.3d 1016, 1017, 874 N.Y.S.2d 920 [2009] ). Nevertheless , it is one that can and should be resolved before a second trial.ORDERED that judgment is reversed......
  • Get Started for Free