People v. Black
Decision Date | 26 November 2008 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 136840.,COA No. 284928. |
Citation | 482 Mich. 1072,769 N.W.2d 226 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Patrick BLACK, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for the correction of the sentencing information report (SIR) to reflect the circuit court's changes made at the sentencing proceeding on August 22, 2007.MCR 6.425(E)(2).The circuit court shall forward a copy of the amended SIR to the Department of Corrections.In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand this case to the trial court...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Black v. Bergh
...is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.People v. Black, 482 Mich. 1072, 769 N.W.2d 226 (2008) (Marilyn J. Kelly, J., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing in acc......
- People v. Raymond, Docket No. 136734.