People v. Black

Decision Date26 November 2008
Docket NumberDocket No. 136840.,COA No. 284928.
Citation482 Mich. 1072,769 N.W.2d 226
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Patrick BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for the correction of the sentencing information report (SIR) to reflect the circuit court's changes made at the sentencing proceeding on August 22, 2007.MCR 6.425(E)(2).The circuit court shall forward a copy of the amended SIR to the Department of Corrections.In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand this case to the trial court...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
2 cases
  • Black v. Bergh
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • April 27, 2012
    ...is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.People v. Black, 482 Mich. 1072, 769 N.W.2d 226 (2008) (Marilyn J. Kelly, J., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing in acc......
  • People v. Raymond, Docket No. 136734.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • November 26, 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT