People v. Bladel, 67568
| Decision Date | 12 April 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 67568,67568 |
| Citation | 413 Mich. 864,317 N.W.2d 855 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudy BLADEL, Defendant-Appellant. 413 Mich. 864, 317 N.W.2d 855 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
ORDER
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered and, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), we REMAND this case, 106 Mich.App. 397, 308 N.W.2d 230, to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of People v. Paintman and People v. Conklin, 412 Mich. 518, 315 N.W.2d 418 (1982). On remand the Court shall also address the merits of defendant's second issue on appeal.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
- People v. Bladel
-
Blake v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
...the matter to this Court for reconsideration in light of People v. Paintman, 412 Mich. 518, 315 N.W.2d 418 (1982). People v. Bladel, 413 Mich. 864, 317 N.W.2d 855 (1982). On remand, this Court concluded that it was compelled to reverse Bladel's conviction in light of Paintman, supra, which ......
-
Hearn v. Mintzes
...was not made [at trial] by the party who appeals." People v. Holmes, 292 Mich. 212, 215, 290 N.W. 384 (1940). Accord, People v. Bladel, 413 Mich. 864, 317 N.W.2d 855 (1982). Therefore, while it is clear that Hearn did not object at trial to those comments now assertedly the basis for the wr......
- People v. Mallory
Request a trial to view additional results