People v. Boles
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
| Citation | People v. Boles, 358 N.W.2d 894, 420 Mich. 851 (Mich. 1984) |
| Decision Date | 14 December 1984 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. 72499 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony BOLES a/k/a Dickie a/k/a Robert Allen, Defendant-Appellant. |
Prior report: 127 Mich.App. 759, 339 N.W.2d 249.
On order of the Court, the defendant having filed a request for review of his conviction, this Court having issued an order to show cause why the defendant's conviction should not be reversed, and the prosecutor's pleadings as well as the response having been considered by the Court,
Now, therefore, it is ORDERED that the request for review be treated as an application for leave to appeal and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgments of the Court of Appeals and of the Recorder's Court for the City of Detroit, and we REMAND the matter to the Recorder's Court for the City of Detroit for a new...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Bailey
...that the defendant was not the cause of the decedent's death.7 I do not agree with the majority's decision to reverse People v. Boles, 420 Mich. 851, 358 N.W.2d 894 (1984), to the extent that its instant holding is inconsistent with it. Rather, I would reaffirm our decision in Boles, becaus......
-
People v. Williams
...the jury with consideration of an entire new set of offenses. I admit that Judge Borman's viewpoint finds support in People v. Boles, 420 Mich. 851, 358 N.W.2d 894 (1984), rev'g 127 Mich.App. 759, 770-771, 339 N.W.2d 249 (1983). In that case, the Supreme Court found reversible error in the ......
-
People v. Steele
...used LSD, even though defendant believed that the drug which he had used or possessed was mescaline. See and compare People v. Boles, 420 Mich. 851, 358 N.W.2d 894 (1984), rev'g. 127 Mich.App. 759, 339 N.W.2d 249 Judge Maher dissented in part in Bragdon, supra. He believed that the possessi......
-
People v. Williams
...fully consider the question addressed by Judge Shepard in concurrence: Whether the peremptory order of this Court in People v. Boles, 420 Mich. 851, 358 N.W.2d 894 (1984), rev'g 127 Mich.App. 759, 339 N.W.2d 249 (1983), is to be understood to mandate jury instructions authorizing conviction......