People v. Brown

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation72 A.D.3d 698,897 N.Y.S.2d 645
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rameek BROWN, appellant.
Decision Date06 April 2010
897 N.Y.S.2d 645
72 A.D.3d 698


The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Rameek BROWN, appellant.


Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

April 6, 2010.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Steven J. Miraglia of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Solomon Neubort, and Bruce Alderman of counsel), for respondent.

72 A.D.3d 698

Appeal by the defendant

from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed October 22, 2008, upon his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), criminal trespass in the second degree, and harassment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

In an order dated March 11, 2010, the Supreme Court, Kings County, in accordance with the Court of Appeals' recent decision in People v. Williams ( NY3d, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 01527 [2010] ), vacated the periods of postrelease supervision challenged on this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal has been rendered academic, and must be dismissed.

SKELOS, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • People v. Etienne, 2019–09199, 2019–09204
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 21 d3 Abril d3 2021
    ...defendant's contention is without merit (see Boreali v. Axelrod, 71 N.Y.2d 1, 8–9, 523 N.Y.S.2d 464, 517 N.E.2d 1350 ; People v. Bravo, 72 A.D.3d at 698, 899 N.Y.S.2d 280 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his challenge to the factual suffic......
  • People v. Bravo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 6 d2 Abril d2 2010
    ...of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.72 A.D.3d 698 A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty is addressed to the sound discretion of the sentencing court ( see CPL 220.60[3]; People v. Villalobos,......
  • People v. Espinal
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 6 d2 Abril d2 2010
    ...82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108;897 N.Y.S.2d 645People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909, 910-911, 563 N.Y.S.2d 43, 564 N.E.2d 653; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; Peop......
  • People v. Bolden
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 6 d2 Abril d2 2010
    ...897 N.Y.S.2d 64572 A.D.3d 697The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Jerrod BOLDEN, appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.April 6, 2010. Jerrod Bolden, Wallkill, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Ap......
4 cases
  • People v. Etienne, 2019–09199, 2019–09204
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 21 d3 Abril d3 2021
    ...defendant's contention is without merit (see Boreali v. Axelrod, 71 N.Y.2d 1, 8–9, 523 N.Y.S.2d 464, 517 N.E.2d 1350 ; People v. Bravo, 72 A.D.3d at 698, 899 N.Y.S.2d 280 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his challenge to the factual suffic......
  • People v. Bravo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 6 d2 Abril d2 2010
    ...of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.72 A.D.3d 698 A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty is addressed to the sound discretion of the sentencing court ( see CPL 220.60[3]; People v. Villalobos,......
  • People v. Espinal
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 6 d2 Abril d2 2010
    ...82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108;897 N.Y.S.2d 645People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909, 910-911, 563 N.Y.S.2d 43, 564 N.E.2d 653; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; Peop......
  • People v. Bolden
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 6 d2 Abril d2 2010
    ...897 N.Y.S.2d 64572 A.D.3d 697The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Jerrod BOLDEN, appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.April 6, 2010. Jerrod Bolden, Wallkill, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Ap......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT