People v. Brown
| Decision Date | 23 October 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89539,No. 108779,89539,108779 |
| Citation | People v. Brown, 461 N.W.2d 213, 436 Mich. 879 (Mich. 1990) |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miron BROWN, Defendant-Appellee. COA436 Mich. 879, 461 N.W.2d 213 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
ORDER
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of People v. Engelman, 434 Mich. 204, 453 N.W.2d 656 (1990).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
People v. Armendarez
...with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made. People v. Toohey, 183 Mich.App. 348, 352, 454 N.W.2d 209 (1990), lv. gtd. 436 Mich. 879 (1990). The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the parallel provision in the Michigan Constitution guarantee the right of ......
-
People v. McKendrick
...with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made. People v. Toohey, 183 Mich.App. 348, 352, 454 N.W.2d 209 (1990), lv. gtd. 436 Mich. 879 (1990). Where tainted information comprises more than [188 MICHAPP 134] a very minor portion of that found in an affidavit supporting a search......
- Opasik v. Ford Motor Co.