People v. Burgos

Decision Date23 February 1999
CitationPeople v. Burgos, 683 N.Y.S.2d 852, 258 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>DAVID BURGOS, Appellant.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

As the People correctly concede, the issue raised by defendant concerning character evidence requires a new trial. The other issues raised by defendant are rendered academic by this disposition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
9 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2015 Contents
    • August 2, 2015
    ...Gailey Co. Inc. v. Wahl, 262 A.D.2d 985,692 N.Y.S.2d 563 (4th Dept. 1999), §§ 5:160, 11:20 Faber v. New York City Housing Authority , 258 A.D.2d 394, 685 N.Y.S. 691 (1st Dept. 1999), §§ 16:10, 16:100 Falkides v. Falkides , 40 A.D.2d 1074, 339 N.Y.S.2d 235 (4th Dept. 1972), §§ 15:150, 15:160......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2014 Contents
    • August 2, 2014
    ...Gailey Co. Inc. v. Wahl, 262 A.D.2d 985,692 N.Y.S.2d 563 (4th Dept. 1999), §§ 5:160, 11:20 Faber v. New York City Housing Authority , 258 A.D.2d 394, 685 N.Y.S. 691 (1st Dept. 1999), §§ 16:10, 16:100 Falkides v. Falkides , 40 A.D.2d 1074, 339 N.Y.S.2d 235 (4th Dept. 1972), §§ 15:150, 15:160......
  • Expert witnesses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2020 Contents
    • August 2, 2020
    ...Sanders v. Otis Elevator Co. , 232 A.D.2d 327, 649 N.Y.S.2d 19 (1st Dept. 1996); but see Faber v. New York City Housing Authority , 258 A.D.2d 394, 685 N.Y.S. 691 (1st Dept. 1999) (plaintif ’s expert was properly precluded from testifying as to ultimate issue, i.e., negligence); for permiss......
  • Expert witnesses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2019 Contents
    • August 2, 2019
    ...Sanders v. Otis Elevator Co. , 232 A.D.2d 327, 649 N.Y.S.2d 19 (1st Dept. 1996); but see Faber v. New York City Housing Authority , 258 A.D.2d 394, 685 N.Y.S. 691 (1st Dept. 1999) (plaintif ’s expert was properly precluded from testifying as to ultimate issue, i.e., negligence); for permiss......
  • Get Started for Free