People v. Butler

Decision Date01 March 1994
Docket NumberNos. 133727,No. 95820-22,134559 and 137727,95820-22,s. 133727
Citation444 Mich. 965,512 N.W.2d 583
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence BUTLER, Defendant-Appellee, and Duane Sturges, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. COA
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, C.J. (dissenting).

I do not agree with reversal based upon the majority's conclusion that the defendants were not entrapped as a matter of law.

This case presents a "virtue testing" scheme. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms did not target anyone in particular when conducting this investigation. It did not suspect or have knowledge of the defendants' participation in criminal activity. The bureau participated in a "fishing expedition," hoping to reel in the prize fish. While an argument can be advanced that the bureau exerted no pressure when it announced its sale items and beeper number, the position is quickly weakened when the agent's actual conduct is considered. On the basis of the facts, it cannot be concluded that the Court of Appeals clearly erred when it held that the government entrapped the defendants. Accordingly, I would affirm the holding of the Court of Appeals.

LEVIN, J., concurs in the statement of MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, C.J.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Corrion v. Berghuis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 7 Julio 2011
    ...present nothing more than an opportunity to commit the crime, entrapment does not exist under state law. People v. Butler, 444 Mich. 965, 966, 512 N.W.2d 583, 583 (1994). The petitioner had a right to present valid defenses at trial, as long as they are supported by the record. See Crane v.......
  • People v. Ealy
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 1 Abril 1997
    ...do nothing more than present the defendant with the opportunity to commit the crime of which he was convicted. People v. Butler, 444 Mich. 965, 966, 512 N.W.2d 583 (1994). Although the issue of sentencing entrapment has not been addressed in Michigan, federal courts have considered the issu......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 9 Julio 2002
    ...law enforcement officials present nothing more than an opportunity to commit the crime, entrapment does not exist. People v. Butler, 444 Mich. 965, 966, 512 N.W.2d 583 (1994). A. Inducing Criminal When examining whether governmental activity would impermissibly induce criminal conduct, seve......
  • People v. Connolly
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 3 Noviembre 1998
    ...correct in its assertion that undercover drug sales conducted by the police do not constitute entrapment per se. People v. Butler, 444 Mich. 965, 966, 512 N.W.2d 583 (1994). However, the trial court did not rely on the "reverse buy" situation alone in its findings. The prosecution is also c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT