People v. Carafas
Decision Date | 26 April 1962 |
Citation | 227 N.Y.S.2d 926,11 N.Y.2d 891 |
Parties | , 182 N.E.2d 413 The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Catherine M. CARAFAS and James P. Carafas, Appellants. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 14 A.D.2d 886, 218 N.Y.S.2d 536.
The defendants were convicted in the County Court, Nassau County, of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree, and they appealed from the judgments of conviction and from every intermediate order.
The Appellate Division affirmed the judgments without opinion and held that no separate appeal lay from the intemediate orders.
The defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carafas v. Vallee
......On direct appeal (following Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961)), petitioner claimed that illegally obtained evidence had been introduced against him at trial. The Appellate Division affirmed the conviction without opinion, People" v. Carafas, 14 A.D.2d 886, 218 N.Y.S.2d 536 (1961), as did the New York Court of Appeals, 11 N.Y.2d 891, 227 N.Y.S.2d 926, 182 N.E. . Page 236 . 2d 413 (1962).1 This Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari. Carafas v. New York, 372 U.S. 948, 83 S.Ct. 944, 9 L.Ed.2d 973 (1963). . \xC2"......
-
People v. Estrialgo
...... The police may not arrest everyone in the area until by process of elimination the felon is found. . The cases which establish this fact pattern are too numerous to cite. Some of the recent cases are: People v. Carafas, 11 N.Y.2d 891, 227 . Page 569 . N.Y.S.2d 926, 182 N.E.2d 413; Landers v. United States, 5 Cir., 304 F.2d 577; United States [37 Misc.2d 274] v. Parrott, 6 Cir., 304 F.2d 619; United States v. Frierson, 7 Cir., 299 F.2d 763; United States v. Potts, 6 Cir., 297 F.2d 68; Moore v. United States, 5 ......
-
State v. Richter
...... We find this a difficult philosophical hurdle to leap. In 1949, the United States Supreme Court squarely held in Wolf v. People of State of Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 33, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 1364, 93 L.Ed. 1782, 1788, that 'in a prosecution in a State court for a State crime the ...642, 184 A.2d 279; United States ex rel. Mancini v. Rundle (E.D.Pa.) 219 F.Supp. 549; Peters v. Dillon (D.Colo.) 227 F.Supp. 487; People v. Carafas, 11 N.Y.2d 891, 227 N.Y.S.2d 926, 182 N.E.2d 413; United States ex rel. Carafas v. LaVallee (2 Cir.) 334 F.2d 331; People v. West, 12 N.Y.2d 1090, ......
-
People v. Salerno
...... (Brinegar v. United States, supra; Husty v. United States, supra; Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Robinson v. United States, supra; McCarthy v. United States, 8 Cir., 264 F.2d 473; Bell v. United States, supra; People v. Carafas, supra.). Extreme examples of circumstances in which police must be permitted some powers of investigation come readily to mind. Suppose an officer finds a man standing alone next to a bloody corpse, or suppose a child has been kidnapped in an area that can be readily isolated by ......