People v. Cash
Decision Date | 10 December 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 2-08-0245.,2-08-0245. |
Citation | 922 N.E.2d 1103 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brandon J. CASH, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Philip J. Nicolosi, Winnebago County State's Attorney, Rockford, IL, Lawrence M. Bauer, Deputy Director State's Attorney Appellate Prosecutor, Gregory L. Slovacek, State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor, Elgin, IL, for Appellant.
Thomas A. Lilien, Deputy Defender, Office of State Appellate Defender, Vicki P. Kouros, Office of State Appellate Defender, Elgin, IL, for Appellee.
Defendant, Brandon J. Cash, was charged with possession with the intent to deliver between 30 and 500 grams of cannabis while within 1,000 feet of a school (720 ILCS 550/5.2(b) (West 2006)). Defendant moved to quash his arrest and suppress the evidence. The circuit court of Winnebago County heard and granted defendant's motion, finding that the brief activation of a police car's emergency lights and siren constituted a seizure of defendant without reasonable suspicion. The State appeals, contending that the trial court did not properly consider the totality of the evidence and that no evidence was adduced indicating that defendant submitted to the officers' show of authority. We affirm.
The following facts are taken from the record and the testimony of Special Agent Greg Brotan of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) at the hearing on defendant's motion to quash and suppress. Brotan testified that, on April 17, 2007, he and other agents were in Rockford, keeping a house belonging to Nicholas Castronovo under surveillance. Brotan testified that the surveillance was pursuant to a warrant to search the Castronovo house. The warrant had not been executed yet because Brotan had received information that Castronovo possessed an AK-47 assault rifle and other firearms in the house. In consideration of the firearm information, the agents did not want to chance a forced entry into the house; instead, they decided to wait until Castronovo left the house, at which time he could be more safely approached. Brotan explained that this was why they were keeping the house under surveillance.
At some point that day, Castronovo left the house, alone, apparently unarmed, and drove a maroon Lincoln Town Car. Brotan and two other officers followed Castronovo's car. Brotan testified that he did not have either a search warrant for Castronovo's car or an arrest warrant for Castronovo or defendant. Brotan testified that, as he followed Castronovo's car, he did not see Castronovo commit any traffic violations. Castronovo stopped and parked his car in the 2200 block of Edgebrook Drive.
Brotan testified that there were other cars parked along Edgebrook Drive. Castronovo parked his car behind another Lincoln Town Car. Brotan did not clearly recall the color of the second Lincoln, but believed it may have been silver. Brotan testified that both cars were legally parked. Brotan testified that he was in an unmarked vehicle, as was each of the other two officers, Special Agent Hilgers of the DEA and Officer Mott.
Brotan testified that, shortly after Castronovo had parked, Hilgers and Mott pulled in behind the Castronovo vehicle. By that time, defendant had joined Castronovo in the car.
Brotan was initially unable to recall whether Hilgers used his lights and siren. After referring to his report, Brotan testified that Hilgers "hit the lights and siren real quick." Brotan explained that Hilgers activated the lights and siren to let Castronovo know that he was behind his car.
Brotan testified that, by the time he had arrived and parked his car behind the other two police cars, Hilgers and Mott were already out of their cars and on either side of Castronovo's car. Both defendant and Castronovo were already out of the car. Brotan testified that he did not hear Hilgers or Mott say anything to Castronovo or defendant, but he also testified that the officers had asked Castronovo and defendant to get out of the car. Brotan testified that it was reported to him that, when Castronovo and defendant opened the doors to the car, Hilgers saw a plastic bag on the seat, and both Hilgers and Mott smelled a strong odor of marijuana as soon as the car doors were opened.
Brotan testified that, as he approached Castronovo's car, he also noticed a strong odor of marijuana. Brotan explained that, based on the pungency of the odor, he believed that the marijuana had been grown hydroponically, as that tends to concentrate the THC content and leads to a more pungent smell than observed in marijuana that is not grown hydroponically. Brotan testified that the bag inside Castronovo's car contained a number of clear plastic bags, all of which contained marijuana. The total weight of the marijuana recovered totaled 87.5 grams. Brotan testified that $9,680 in cash was also recovered. According to Brotan, defendant eventually admitted that he was using the money to purchase marijuana from Castronovo.
Following Brotan's testimony and argument by the parties, the trial court gave the following ruling from the bench:
About three weeks later, the State filed a motion to reconsider. Nearly three months after the motion was filed, the court heard arguments and made the following ruling:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Lopez
...and the police cannot, as a matter of law, amount to a seizure of that person”)internal quotation marks omitted))). ¶ 31 Defendant cites People v. Cash for the proposition that “a seizure occurs either where physical force is used on the suspect or, absent the use of physical force, where t......
- State v. Anderson
-
People v. Colquitt, 1–12–1138.
...stop of a moving vehicle but rather concerns an already stopped vehicle that was parked in the road. In People v. Cash, 396 Ill.App.3d 931, 949, 337 Ill.Dec. 526, 922 N.E.2d 1103 (2009), the appellate court held that the activation of emergency lights and siren constituted a seizure. Howeve......
-
CITIZENS NAT. BANK v. KIDS HOPE UNITED INC.
... ... "Neighbors," perhaps then a broader term than current usage admits, meant people from surrounding farms as well as those in town, where everyone went to learn, worship, visit, buy and sell. La Fern and Ettoile, as rural ... ...