People v. Caskey

Decision Date24 March 1972
Docket NumberGen. No. 71--322
Citation4 Ill.App.3d 920,282 N.E.2d 250
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry C. CASKEY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Paul Bradley, Dist. Defender, Ill. Defender Project, Mount Vernon, for defendant-appellant; Robert E. Farrell, Asst. Dist. Defender, Mount Vernon, of counsel.

Robert H. Rice, State's Atty., St. Clair County, Belleville, for plaintiff-appellee.

GEORGE J. MORAN, Presiding Justice.

Defendant, Jerry C. Caskey, entered a plea of guilty to a charge of burglary and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than five nor more than 15 years.He thereafter filed a post conviction petition which was dismissed on motion of the State's Attorney.His only contention on appeal is that the court erred in dismissing defendant's post conviction petition without an evidentiary hearing.

Prior to receiving defendant's guilty plea, the court conducted an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding defendant's desire to so plead.During this inquiry the State's Attorney stated that he had conferred with defense counsel concerning the case at which time he indicated that he would make a recommendation to the court in regard to the punishment to be imposed.We have reviewed the entire record and find that despite this promise no recommendation was ever made.

It is well established in this state that a plea of guilty induced by unfulfilled promises loses its voluntary nature and shall be considered void.(People v. Washington, 38 Ill.2d 446, 232 N.E.2d 738;People v. Spicer, 47 Ill.2d 114, 264 N.E.2d...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • State v. Myers
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1998
    ...Cir. 1971); People v. Bannan, 364 Mich. 471, 110 N.W.2d 673 (1961); Crossin v. State, 262 So.2d 250 (Fla.App.1972); People v. Caskey, 4 Ill.App.3d 920, 282 N.E.2d 250 (1972).14 We believe that it would be a manifest injustice and inconsistent with our prior decisions to not allow Mr. Myers ......
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • July 26, 1974
    ...States, 306 F.2d 707 (9th Cir. 1962); People v. Barajas, supra; Crossin v. State, 262 So.2d 250 (Fla.App. 1972); People v. Caskey, 4 Ill.App.3d 920, 282 N.E.2d 250 (1972); Wood v. Commonwealth, People v. Bannan, 364 Mich. 471, 110 N.W.2d 673 (1961); State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465, 160 N.W.2......
  • Brooks v. Narick
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1978
    ...Cir. 1971); People v. Bannan, 364 Mich. 471, 110 N.W.2d 673 (1961); Crossin v. State, 262 So.2d 250 (Fla.App.1972); People v. Caskey, 4 Ill.App.3d 920, 282 N.E.2d 250 (1972); State ex rel. Clancey v. Coiner, 154 W.Va. 857, 179 S.E.2d 726 (1971). We have been cited to no cases contra, nor ha......
  • Sturgis v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 8, 1975
    ...People v. Barajas, (26 Cal.App.3d 932, 103 Cal.Rptr. 405 (1972)); Crossin v. State, 262 So.2d 250 (Fla.App. 1972); People v. Caskey, 4 Ill.App.3d 920, 282 N.E.2d 250 (1972); Wood v. Commonwealth, (469 S.W.2d 765 (Ky. 1971)); People v. Bannan, 364 Mich. 471, 110 N.W.2d 673 (1961); State v. W......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT