People v. Curtis
| Decision Date | 10 October 2006 |
| Docket Number | 2004-03461. |
| Citation | 2006 NY Slip Op 07369,33 A.D.3d 721,821 N.Y.S.2d 918 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMMIE CURTIS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The plea minutes demonstrate that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, and that he understood the crime to which he was pleading guilty (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]). Further, the defendant's guilty plea precludes him from challenging claimed defects in the grand jury proceedings (see People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227 [2000]; People v Miller, 306 AD2d 294 [2003]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
People v. Ceparano
...jury proceedings and nonjurisdictional issues concerning alleged prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury ( see People v. Curtis, 33 A.D.3d 721, 821 N.Y.S.2d 918;People v. Miller, 306 A.D.2d 294, 760 N.Y.S.2d 342). Also, the defendant's voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of hi......
-
People v. Curtis
...could have been, raised on the defendant's prior appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered April 13, 2004 ( see People v. Curtis, 33 A.D.3d 721, 821 N.Y.S.2d 918).RIVERA, J.P., SGROI, HINDS–RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., ...
- People v. Curtis
- Matter of Goodman v. Estate of Anna Druck