People v. Dade
| Decision Date | 07 December 1961 |
| Citation | 15 A.D.2d 629,222 N.Y.S.2d 154 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald M. DADE, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Robert W. Tills, Buffalo, for appellant.
Carman F. Ball, Buffalo, for respondent (John M. Frysick, Buffalo, of counsel).
Before WILLIAMS, P. J., and BASTOW, GOLDMAN, HALPERN, and HENRY, JJ.
In October, 1959, an indictment was returned against defendant charging him with the crime of robbery, first degree, in that he, being armed with a dangerous weapon, robbed an employee of a supermarket. Following trial he was found guilty, as charged, and sentenced as a second offender. Some eighteen months after the trial it was discovered by the People that the weapon used in the robbery was 'inoperable'. This fact is now conceded in the brief of the prosecution. Thus, the crime of robbery, first degree, has not been established as there is a complete failure of proof that defendant was armed with a dangerous weapon. (Cf. 1 Wharton's Criminal Law & Procedure, p. 721). The only proof is that the gun was pointed at the person robbed. There was no evidence and no claim is made by the People that the gun was used as a club, or that the defendant threatened so to use it, upon which a finding might have been made that the weapon was a dangerous one. Moreover, there is no claim that subdivisions 2, 3 or 4 of section 2124 of the Penal Law are here applicable. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.
Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Archie
...an inference. (People v. Fwilo, 47 A.D.2d 727, 365 N.Y.S.2d 194; People v. Iglesias, 40 A.D.2d 778, 337 N.Y.S.2d 740; People v. Dade, 15 A.D.2d 629, 222 N.Y.S.2d 154; cf. People v. Strong, 47 A.D.2d 798, 365 N.Y.S.2d Chapter 1012 of the Laws of 1969 appears to have been the response to such......
-
People v. Knowles
...degree robbery statute, section 2128 of the former Penal Law (see People v. Gordon, 19 A.D.2d 828, 243 N.Y.S.2d 573; People v. Dade, 15 A.D.2d 629, 222 N.Y.S.2d 154; People v. King, 13 A.D.2d 997, 216 N.Y.S.2d 755). This principle was overturned by the Court of Appeals in People v. Roden (2......
-
People v. Gordon
...and it is not shown that it was used as a club or in some other manner that would qualify it as a 'dangerous weapon' (People v. Dade, 15 A.D.2d 629, 222 N.Y.S.2d 154; People v. King, 13 A.D.2d 997, 216 N.Y.S.2d There are issues of fact concerning the operability of the gun and the treatment......
-
People v. Davis
...under section 2124, subdivision 1 of the Penal Law. This was error (People v. King, 13 A.D.2d 997, 216 N.Y.S.2d 755; People v. Dade, 15 A.D.2d 629, 222 N.Y.S.2d 154; People v. Gordon, 19 A.D.2d 828, 243 N.Y.S.2d 573; People v. Ahmed, 27 A.D.2d 729, 277 N.Y.S.2d In combination these errors m......