People v. Davenport

Decision Date03 July 2013
Docket NumberDocket No. 146652.,COA No. 306868.
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Ervine Lee DAVENPORT, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Prior report: Mich.App., 2012 WL 6217134.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. While the Court of Appeals erroneously failed to consider defendant's claim in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U.S. 560, 570, 106 S.Ct. 1340, 89 L.Ed.2d 525 (1986) (“the question must be not whether jurors actually articulated a consciousness of some prejudicial effect, but rather whether ‘an unacceptable risk is presented of impermissible factors coming into play’), citing Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 505, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976), the error was harmless under the facts of this case. Given the substantial evidence of guilt presented at trial, we cannot conclude that there was an unacceptable risk of impermissible factors coming into play.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Brown v. Davenport
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • April 21, 2022
    ...Id. , at *2, n. 2. The Michigan Supreme Court denied Mr. Davenport's request for discretionary review. People v. Davenport , 494 Mich. 875, 832 N.W.2d 389, 390 (2013).CMr. Davenport next sought relief in federal district court, filing a habeas petition in the Western District of Michigan. U......
  • Davenport v. MacLaren
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • September 15, 2020
    ...leave to appeal, it said that Holbrook should have governed the lower court's harmless-error analysis. People v. Davenport , 494 Mich. 875, 832 N.W.2d 389 (2013) ( Davenport III ) (citing Holbrook v. Flynn , 475 U.S. 560, 570, 106 S.Ct. 1340, 89 L.Ed.2d 525 (1986) ). But the result would ha......
  • Davenport v. Maclaren
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 30, 2020
    ...2012 WL 6217134, at *3 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 13, 2012). The Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal. People v. Davenport , 494 Mich. 875, 832 N.W.2d 389, 390 (2013). It stated that, although "the Court of Appeals erroneously failed to consider defendant's claim in light of the United S......
  • Brown v. Davenport
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • April 21, 2022
    ... ... jury saw the defendant's shackles" and, if so, ... "whether the prosecution can demonstrate beyond a ... reasonable doubt that the shackling error did not contribute ... to the verdict against the defendant." People v ... Davenport, 488 Mich. 1054, 794 N.W.2d 616(2011) ...          On ... remand, the trial court conducted an evidentiary ... hearing in which it heard from all 12 jurors. Five remembered ... seeing Mr. Davenport's restraints; the remaining seven ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT