People v. DeJonge
| Decision Date | 17 October 1990 |
| Docket Number | 109010,Nos. 87978,87979,Nos. 106149,s. 87978,s. 106149 |
| Citation | 461 N.W.2d 365,436 Mich. 875 |
| Parties | , 63 Ed. Law Rep. 626 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark DEJONGE and Chris Dejonge, Defendants-Appellants. PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John and Sandra BENNETT, Defendants-Appellants. COA |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Prior report: 179 Mich.App. 225, 449 N.W.2d 899.
ORDER
On order of the Court, the motion for admission of foreign counsel pro hac vice is considered, and it is GRANTED. The motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae also are considered, and they are GRANTED. The delayed application for leave to appeal is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Department of Social Services v. Emmanuel Baptist Church, 434 Mich. 380, 455 N.W.2d 1 (1990), and decisions of the United States Supreme Court since the issuance of the Court of Appeals decision in this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
People v. DeJonge
...granting leave to appeal, remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of recent case precedent. 7 436 Mich. 875, 461 N.W.2d 365 (1990). Following remand, the Court of Appeals again affirmed the defendants' convictions. 188 Mich.App. 447, 470 N.W.2d 433 (1991) (DeJ......
-
Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland
... ... Cir.1990); Kratz v. Kratz, 477 F.Supp. 463, 473 (E.D.Pa.1979) ("a telephone call ... is a wire communication"); accord People v. Otto, 2 Cal.4th 1088, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 596, 602 & n. 7, 831 P.2d 1178, 1184 & n. 7 ("it is well settled that a telephone conversation is a 'wire ... ...
-
People v. DeJonge
...Court, we have been asked to reconsider our opinion in People v. DeJonge, 179 Mich.App. 225, 449 N.W.2d 899 (1989). People v. DeJonge, 436 Mich. 875, 461 N.W.2d 365 (1990). We have undertaken the reconsideration in light of recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court and our Supreme......
- Stroh v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co., 88430