People v. Douglas

Docket NumberA140279
Decision Date28 September 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
56 cases
  • Barajas v. City of Rohnert Park
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • February 5, 2016
    ... ... A (Tatum Dep.) 55:25-56:1, Dkt. No. 32-1. He testified he cleared the room for any people and then went into a dining area and the kitchen, making his way towards the front where he could hear talking. Id. 58:2-9. He also testified he ... People v. Douglas , 240 Cal.App.4th 855, 857, 193 Cal.Rptr.3d 79 (2015), as modified on denial of reh'g (Oct. 19, 2015), review filed (Nov. 10, 2015) (quoting ... ...
  • Bauman v. Christopher B. (In re Estate of Christopher B.)
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 28, 2015
    ... ... ( People v. Karriker (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 763, 775, 57 Cal.Rptr.3d 412 ; In re Polk (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1230, 1237, 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 389.) Christopher B ... ...
  • State v. Cornell
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • April 22, 2016
    ... ... Nevertheless, some courts have authorized suspicionless searches for probationers as well as parolees. See, e.g., People v. Douglas, 240 Cal.App.4th 855, 193 Cal.Rptr.3d 79, 85 (2015), as modified on denial of reh'g (Oct. 19, 2015), review denied (Jan. 20, 2016) ... ...
  • People v. Delrio
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 28, 2020
    ... ... Thus, the officer must have some knowledge not just of the fact someone is on probation, but of the existence of a search clause broad enough to justify the search at issue." ( People v. Douglas (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 855, 863, 193 Cal.Rptr.3d 79.) 5 Carpenter held that the governments access of historical cell phone records that chronicle a users past movements is a search under the Fourth Amendment. ( Carpenter , supra , 138 S.Ct. at p. 2211.) 6 We note In re Ricardo P. (2019) ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 5 - §3. Exceptions to warrant requirement
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Chapter 5 Exclusion of Evidence on Constitutional Grounds
    • Invalid date
    ...more akin to parolees than probationers. See U.S. v. Cervantes (9th Cir.2017) 859 F.3d 1175, 1181; People v. Douglas (1st Dist.2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 855, 864-65. Similarly, because juvenile probationers are not subject to consent searches like other probationers are, searches of juvenile pr......
  • Table of Cases null
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...§9.2.1 People v. Dorsey, 43 Cal. App. 3d 953, 118 Cal. Rptr. 362 (5th Dist. 1974)—Ch. 3-B, §20.2.4(1) People v. Douglas, 240 Cal. App. 4th 855, 193 Cal. Rptr. 3d 79 (1st Dist. 2015)—Ch. 5-A, §3.3.8(1)(b) People v. Douglas, 66 Cal. App. 3d 998, 136 Cal. Rptr. 358 (2d Dist. 1977)—Ch. 5-B, §4.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT