People v. Dunaway

Decision Date23 October 1974
Citation35 N.Y.2d 741,361 N.Y.S.2d 912
Parties, 320 N.E.2d 646 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Irving Jerome DUNAWAY, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order, 42 A.D.2d 689, 346 N.Y.S.2d 779, affirmed.

No opinion.

BREITEL, C.J., and GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, SAMUEL RABIN and STEVENS, JJ., concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 26 Noviembre 1985
    ...made that rule binding on us. We had declined to adopt the Dunaway rule as a matter of Federal or State Law. (People v. Dunaway, 35 N.Y.2d 741, 361 N.Y.S.2d 912, 320 N.E.2d 646, vacated 422 U.S. 1053, 95 S.Ct. 2674, 45 L.Ed.2d 705, on remand 38 N.Y.2d 812, 382 N.Y.S.2d 40, 345 N.E.2d 583, 6......
  • Dunaway v. New York
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 5 Junio 1979
    ...Court of Appeals initially affirmed the conviction without opinion. 42 A.D.2d 689, 346 N.Y.S.2d 779 (1973), aff'd 35 N.Y.2d 741, 361 N.Y.S.2d 912, 320 N.E.2d 646 (1974). However, this Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of......
  • People v. Barnes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 20 Septiembre 1979
    ... ... The defendant, relying on the recent Supreme Court decision in Dunaway v. New York, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 2248, 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979) argued that if it should develop that the police did lack probable cause unless the taint of the unlawful arrest was attenuated, evidence as to the identification of the defendant should be suppressed. In Dunaway, the Supreme Court ... ...
  • People v. Dunaway
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Marzo 1978
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT