People v. Fatsis

Decision Date12 January 1999
Citation180 Misc.2d 172,688 N.Y.S.2d 378
Parties, 1999 N.Y. Slip Op. 99,156 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Kyriakoula FATSIS, Defendant. . Rockland County
CourtNew York Justice Court

Kyriakoula Fatsis, defendant pro se.

No appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

ARNOLD P. ETELSON, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss her speeding charge contending that she appeared at the time and date directed in her appearance ticket and the court was not in session. The ticket was returnable on a Sunday evening.

Defendant cites Abbott v. Rose, 40 Misc.2d 64, 242 N.Y.S.2d 773 and Bennett v. Mannix, 30 Misc.2d 613, 219 N.Y.S.2d 566 as her authority for the dismissal.

The Abbott case was decided in 1963 in a mandamus proceeding in Supreme Court filed to prevent a Justice of the Peace from conducting further proceedings in the case. It stood for the proposition that the court was a Court of Special Sessions whose jurisdiction was limited to specific dates on which the court was in session. The rationale was that the court either had no jurisdiction, or if it had, it could not adjourn the case to another date because no judge appeared in court on the erroneous return date. Abbott cites the Mannix case.

It is well known that an appearance ticket is merely an invitation to appear in court. Jurisdiction usually follows by the filing of a simplified traffic information with the court. Section 100.10(2)(a) and 150.10 of the Criminal Procedure Law and Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 207.

By virtue of the Uniform Justice Court Act in 1967 the local court system was revised and new court names and Judge's titles came into existence. The former village Police Courts and town Justice's Courts became the Justice Courts. The Police Justice or Police Judge became the Village Justice and the Justice of the Peace became the Town Justice. Sections 102 and 103.

The Criminal Procedure Law, effective September 1, 1971, abolished the Code of Criminal Procedure and created Town and Village Courts and their respective jurisdictions. Section 10.10. It was the death-knell of the Court of Special Sessions and the Justices of the Peace and furnished the Town or Village Justice with the authority to handle every aspect of a misdemeanor, violation or traffic infraction from beginning to end. See Commission Staff notes in Consolidated Law Service preceding and following CPL Section 10.10. Section 2001 of the UJCA clothes the courts with the jurisdiction and procedure prescribed by the CPL. By...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Sterritt, 19060233
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • February 21, 2020
    ...UJCA § 2001.2 People v. Guerrerio, 181 Misc 2d 517, 520 (1999).3 People v. Cruz, 86 AD3d 782, 783 (3d Dept. 2011).4 People v. Fatsis, 180 Misc 2d 172, 173 (1999).5 Shapiro v. MacAffer, 99 Misc 2d 694, 695 (1979) and Abbott v. Rose, 40 Misc 2d 64, 67 (1963).6 NYS VTL § 1806.7 NYS VTL § 1806.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT