People v. Feeley

Decision Date15 October 1940
Docket NumberNo. 25655.,25655.
CitationPeople v. Feeley, 374 Ill. 402, 29 N.E.2d 593 (Ill. 1940)
PartiesPEOPLE v. FEELEY et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Error to Circuit Court, St. Clair County; Maurice V. Joyce, Judge.

Frances Feeley and Peggie Nash were convicted for larceny of certain wearing apparel and other department store merchandise, and they bring error.

Affirmed.Lindauer & Lindauer and Sam S. Pessin, all of Belleville, for plaintiffs in error.

John E. Cassidy, Atty. Gen., Louis P. Zerweck, State's Atty., of Belleville, and A. B. Dennis, of Springfield, for defendant in error.

SHAW, Justice.

Frances Feeley and Peggie Nash were convicted by a jury in the circuit court of St. Clair county for larceny of certain wearing apparel and other department store merchandise valued at $28.16. They have sued out this writ of error.

On December 8, 1939, police officers of East St. Louis halted Edward Beckler for driving at an excessive rate of speed. Discovering a shoplifter's box together with a quantity of merchandise in the car they took Beckler to the station. He admitted that the car belonged to Peggie Nash, one of the plaintiffs in error, and that he was a brother of Frances Feeley, the other plaintiff in error. Beckler acknowledged in a statement given to the police that he drove the car for the plaintiffs in error while they were picking up various articles of merchandise in several department stores. Both of the girls admitted in a written statement given to the police that they had taken quantities of merchandise from four department stores in St. Louis, Missouri, and from three department stores in East St. Louis, Illinois.

When a search of the car was made by the police two shoplifter's boxes were found. They were described by the officers as a cardboard box, wrapped in wrapping paper and tied with a string, having a hole about three by five inches in one corner of the box. Examination of the articles in the car of plaintiffs in error disclosed twenty-four men's shirts, nine ties, sixty-one pairs of men's socks, eighteen ladies' slips, twelve pairs of ladies' gloves, eight house coats, twenty-nine men's handkerchiefs, nine boxes of rouge, five bottles of perfume, necklaces, cosmetic bags, etc.

George E. Jarrach, manager of the East St. Louis W. T. Grant & Company store, identified certain articles mentioned in the indictment as having come from the East St. Louis store.

Plaintiffs in error testified that the articles found in their car had been purchased in several stores in St. Louis,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • People v. Wachowicz
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 1, 1968
    ...rule that the corpus delicti may be established by circumstantial evidence (22A C.J.S. Criminal Law § 604, p. 410; People v. Feeley, 374 Ill. 402, 29 N.E.2d 593). The attempted break was made in a tavern. The manager testified he had left the premises at 3:30 in the morning and had locked t......
  • People v. Sims
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • October 28, 1966
    ...as it may be used to connect the accused with the commission of the crime. People v. Jones, 382 Ill. 603, 48 N.E.2d 364; People v. Feeley, 374 Ill. 402, 29 N.E.2d 593. The credibility of the witnesses was a matter for the jury to determine, and we will not substitute our judgment for that o......
  • Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Vill. of South Pekin
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • October 15, 1940
  • People v. Rife
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1943
    ...as well as for the purpose of connecting the accused with the crime. People v. Gillespie, 344 Ill. 290, 176 N.E. 316;People v. Feeley, 374 Ill. 402, 29 N.E.2d 593. There is no invariable rule as to the quantum of proof necessary to establish the corpus delicti. Each case must depend, in a m......
  • Get Started for Free