People v. Ferns
Decision Date | 23 November 1976 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 26666 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark A. FERNS, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Goldstein & Raznick, P.C. by Lawrence S. Katz, Warren, for defendant-appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., George N. Parris, Pros. Atty., William Alan Dardy, Asst. Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before D. E. HOLBROOK, Jr., P.J., and KAUFMAN and RILEY, JJ.
Defendant Mark Ferns, in return for the dismissal of four other pending charges, pleaded guilty to a single count of receiving stolen property over a value of $100, M.C.L.A. § 750.535; M.S.A. § 28.803.
At the later sentence hearing, but before the actual imposition of sentence, the following exchange between defendant and the judge took place:
'The Court: Mr. Ferns, anything you'd like to say?
'The Court: Are you telling me that you're not guilty of this offense?
'The Defendant: Yes.'
Although defendant's two defense attorneys denied that they had dictated the wording of the guilty plea form, they did acknowledge the discussion of a 'potential' life term under the habitual criminal statute.
The sentencing judge then informed defendant that if the court allowed defendant to withdraw the plea, the prosecutor could proceed on the other four charges as well as the instant charge. Defendant replied that he was aware of the possibility, but nonetheless wished to withdraw his plea:
'The Defendant: * * * I feel that I wasn't in my right state of mind to do that (I.e. plead guilty), and I feel that if I had a fair trial, if I'm found guilty of something, I'm willing to accept, to take what's coming to me, but I was so nervous and shook up from what they told me that I just couldn't think right to make that plea * * *.'
The sentencing judge denied defendant's request and imposed a term of 2 to 5 years in prison.
On appeal, defendant contends that the threat of possible life imprisonment made known to him while he was in jail on another charge hung over him like a sword of Damocles and thus coerced him into pleading guilty.
People v. Bencheck, 360 Mich. 430, 104 N.W.2d 191 (1960), serves as the guiding light on the issue before us. There the Court observed:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ruez
...analysis since that time. The focus in many subsequent decisions is on the application of "great liberality," People v. Ferns, 72 Mich.App. 479, 249 N.W.2d 868 (1976); People v. Hatcher, 83 Mich.App. 307, 268 N.W.2d 389 (1978), lv. den. 405 Mich. 823 (1979); People v. Bentley, 94 Mich.App. ......