People v. Ferrell
| Decision Date | 19 March 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. C-1583,C-1583 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner, v. Bruce FERRELL, Jr., Respondent. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Terrance Farina, Dist. Atty., James R. Alvillar, Deputy Dist. Atty., Grand Junction, for petitioner.
Dufford, Waldeck & Williams, Laird T. Milburn, Ware B. Flora, Grand Junction, for respondent.
The People appeal from the district court's reversal on appeal of the defendant's conviction in the county court. The county court had found him guilty of obtaining goods of value by deception in violation of section 18-4-401, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8). We granted certiorari to the district court and affirm.
Two sales clerks of Keith O'Brien, a Grand Junction department store, testified that on July 9, 1976 the defendant had purchased three jackets and some shirts and opened a credit account to which the purchases were charged. The account was not paid. The defendant denied the alleged transactions with the store and claimed he had been in California on July 9, 1976. A friend corroborated his alibi.
The district court reversed the conviction on the grounds that no deception had been proved and that there had been no theft.
The issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of deception. The evidence shows that the defendant gave his name on the credit application as "Robert Bruce Ferrell" rather than his correct name of Bruce Ferrell, Jr." However, the People did not establish that anyone at Keith O'Brien's was deceived into extending credit by this. One saleswoman testified that she recognized the defendant from previous sales at Keith O'Brien's, as well as at another store where she had worked. Another saleswoman testified that she knew him as Bruce Ferrell, a regular customer. Moreover, credit was extended on the basis of a report from the credit bureau which contained information about the defendant under his correct name.
The People also claim that the defendant gave an incorrect address, viz. "819 Jamaica" instead of "620 Canyon Creek." Yet, the only evidence to that effect was a saleswoman's testimony that the credit card mailed to 819 Jamaica some time after July 9, 1976 was returned because the address was incorrect. A phone bill sent to 620 Canyon Creek which covered the period from June 29 to August 27, 1976 also was introduced into evidence.
The important thing is that the People failed to show that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Norman
...made to the victim caused the victim to part with something of value in reliance upon those misrepresentations. People v. Ferrell, 197 Colo. 253, 591 P.2d 1038 (1979); People v. Terranova, 38 Colo.App. 476, 563 P.2d 363 (1976). The trial court apparently found defendant's failure to inform ......
-
People v. Quick, 83SA446
...victim caused the victim to part with something of value in reliance upon those misrepresentations." Id. at 1268; see People v. Ferrell, 197 Colo. 253, 591 P.2d 1038 (1979). While Norman discusses types of conduct which may constitute deception, it does not imply that all misrepresentations......
-
People v. Warner
...value and that the victim relied upon the swindler's misrepresentations. Id. at 483, 563 P.2d at 368. See also People v. Ferrell, 197 Colo. 253, 255, 591 P.2d 1038, 1039 (1979) (evidence failed to support defendant's conviction for theft by deception where store personnel did not rely on de......
-
Fitzgerald v. State
...Court, 77 N.J. 475, 391 A.2d 490 (1978); Kinder v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 477 S.W.2d 584, 586 (1971), reh. den.; and People v. Ferrell, Colo., 591 P.2d 1038, 1039 (1979). The Rationale for The logic of the trial judge and the majority disturbs me. In pronouncing Fitzgerald guilty, the trial ......